When it comes to upright vacuum cleaners, Shark has earned a reputation for delivering powerful, feature-packed machines at competitive prices. Among its most popular models are the Shark NV752 Rotator Powered Lift-Away TruePet and the Shark NV501 Rotator Professional Lift-Away. Both vacuums promise deep-cleaning performance, sealed HEPA filtration, and Shark’s signature Lift-Away technology—but they’re not built equally. The NV752 is marketed as the premium choice, especially for homes with pets, while the NV501 aims to strike a balance between performance, price, and everyday usability. This comparison breaks down how each model performs across critical categories: design, suction power, ease of maintenance, noise levels, energy efficiency, pet-friendliness, and overall value. Whether you’re cleaning high-pile carpet, hard floors, or chasing pet hair embedded in upholstery, this in-depth review will help you decide which vacuum is the better investment for your home—and your cleaning style.
Shark NV752 vs Shark NV501 Comparison Chart
If you click the links below, under the product images, you will be redirected to Amazon.com. In case you then decide to buy anything, Amazon.com will pay me a commission. This doesn’t affect the honesty of this review in any way though.
| Feature | Shark NV752 | Shark NV501 |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
| Check the best price on Amazon | Check the best price on Amazon | |
| Full Product Name | Shark Rotator Powered Lift-Away TruePet Upright Vacuum | Shark Rotator Professional Lift-Away Upright Vacuum |
| Weight | ~15.8 lbs | ~15.5 lbs |
| Lift-Away Type | Powered Lift-Away (motorized brushroll stays active) | Standard Lift-Away (brushroll deactivates when lifted) |
| Motor Power | 1200 watts | 1200 watts |
| Dust Cup Capacity | 1.5 quarts | 1.3 quarts |
| Filtration | HEPA Filter with Anti-Allergen Complete Seal Technology | HEPA Filter with Anti-Allergen Complete Seal Technology |
| Surface Settings | 3-mode selector (Hard Floor, Low Pile, Thick Carpet) | Brushroll on/off switch only |
| Brushroll Type | Standard brushroll with hair removal groove | Standard brushroll |
| LED Headlights | Yes (on floor nozzle) | Yes (on floor nozzle) |
| Cord Length | 30 feet | 30 feet |
| Hose Length | ~6 feet | ~6 feet |
| Swivel Steering | Yes | Yes |
| Included Pet Tool | Motorized TruePet mini brush | Suction-only Pet Power Brush |
| Other Attachments | Crevice tool, upholstery tool, dusting brush, Hard Floor Hero (varies by model) | Crevice tool, dusting brush, wide upholstery tool |
| Hard Floor Performance | Excellent with optional Hard Floor Hero tool | Good |
| Carpet Performance | Excellent, especially on high-pile | Very Good, best on low- to medium-pile |
| Noise Level | ~80–82 dB | ~78–80 dB |
| Best For | Homes with pets, mixed floors, deep cleaning needs | General home use, smaller spaces, light pet needs |
Design & Build Quality
When comparing upright vacuums, design isn’t just about aesthetics—it’s about functionality, durability, storage convenience, and how the unit fits into the flow of daily cleaning. The Shark NV752 and NV501 both fall under the Rotator line, which means they share several foundational traits. Still, once you look closer, the differences in design and build quality start to shape very different user experiences. In this section, we’ll explore the key aspects of their construction, physical layout, quality of materials, and how these design choices impact everyday use.
Aesthetics and Overall Appearance
The NV752 comes in a burgundy finish with sleek chrome accents, giving it a slightly more premium look. It’s styled to appear modern and tech-forward, and the build reflects Shark’s attempt to market this as a high-end model. The design looks more refined and sophisticated than the NV501, which has a more traditional upright vacuum appearance with a white and red color scheme. The NV501 isn’t unattractive, but it has a more functional, workhorse aesthetic that might appeal to users who prioritize practicality over polish.
That said, appearance is subjective. What’s more important is how those aesthetic choices are implemented and whether they enhance or hinder usability. In the NV752, the LED lighting, the rounded design of the dust canister, and the streamlined Lift-Away pod all look and feel more cohesive. The NV501, by contrast, seems a bit more modular—useful, but not as elegant.
Material Quality
Both models use a mix of sturdy plastics for their housings, but the NV752 has a more solid, dense feel when handled. You can sense the reinforcement in the brushroll housing and the Lift-Away mechanism. It gives off a more “professional-grade” impression. The handle, hose casing, and accessory lock-ins feel tight and secure.
The NV501, while still very well-built for its class, feels slightly lighter in material strength. Some users may notice more flex in the wand and hose assembly, especially when applying lateral pressure. This doesn’t necessarily mean it’s fragile—it holds up well under normal use—but it gives the impression of being more suited for routine home cleaning than aggressive deep-cleaning sessions. The plastic is slightly thinner in some spots, and the wheels don’t roll quite as smoothly on thick carpet or transitions between surfaces.
Dimensions and Weight
Physically, these vacuums are close in size, but there are a few critical differences that affect maneuverability and storage. The NV752 weighs around 15.8 pounds in upright mode, while the NV501 comes in at approximately 15.5 pounds. On paper, the difference is minimal, but in practice, the NV752 feels heavier. This is due to its powered Lift-Away system and the larger dustbin, which add some weight to the base and the handheld pod.
The weight distribution also differs. The NV752 feels bottom-heavy, with most of the weight concentrated around the motor and floor head. This adds stability while cleaning, but makes lifting it onto stairs or into closets a bit more awkward. The NV501 distributes its weight more evenly, and it feels a bit easier to carry up and down stairs or over thresholds.
Both units feature a low-profile cleaning head, but the NV501 has a slightly more compact design. This makes it easier to fit into tighter spaces and under furniture. That said, the NV752’s powered Lift-Away mode compensates for its bulk by allowing the user to detach the canister and use the powered brushroll while extending into low-clearance areas—a capability the NV501 lacks.
LED Lighting
Both vacuums come with LED headlights mounted on the floor nozzle, a design touch that significantly improves visibility when vacuuming dark corners, under beds, or during late-night tidying. However, the NV752 features slightly brighter, wider-spread LED lights, which give a better view of the floor in front of the brushroll.
This is a subtle but useful advantage. The NV752’s LED system feels more integrated into the design, whereas the NV501’s lights are helpful but less powerful and sometimes dimmer when the battery (or motor) is under load.
Dustbin Design and Capacity
The NV752 is equipped with a larger dust cup—approximately 1.5 quarts—while the NV501 holds around 1.3 quarts. In practice, this means fewer trips to the trash can, especially in homes with pets or large carpeted areas. The NV752’s dustbin is also slightly easier to remove, empty, and clean due to its one-touch release and more robust hinge system.
Another design win for the NV752 is its fully sealed HEPA filtration system, which is tightly integrated into the canister design. This makes it less likely to leak fine dust particles during use or emptying. The NV501 also features HEPA filtration, but its sealing isn’t as comprehensive. Over time, this can lead to small amounts of dust escaping during heavy cleaning sessions.
Lift-Away Mechanism
One of the biggest design differences between the NV752 and NV501 lies in their Lift-Away systems.
The NV501 uses a standard Lift-Away design: the canister detaches from the base, allowing the user to carry it around and use the wand and hose for above-floor cleaning. This system works well for stairs, shelves, and furniture, but when the pod is lifted, the floor head is no longer powered. This means that while the vacuum can technically still clean floors in Lift-Away mode, it loses the active agitation of the brushroll.
The NV752, on the other hand, features Shark’s Powered Lift-Away. This design innovation allows the brushroll to remain active even after the canister is detached. This makes a huge difference when cleaning under couches, beds, or tight spaces. You can keep the same deep-cleaning power while using the more flexible, slimmed-down pod. For users who deal with heavy pet hair or want a deeper clean under furniture, this feature is a major design upgrade.
Hose and Wand Integration
Both vacuums have detachable wands and hoses, but the NV752’s feel more integrated. The connections are tighter, the release buttons are more tactile, and the build quality of the hose material is a bit more resilient. The NV501’s hose is easier to flex but more prone to collapse under suction, which can occasionally cause tipping if not positioned correctly.
The wand release on the NV752 is more intuitive, and the pivot angle of the handle is more comfortable during extended cleaning. It’s small touches like these that make a vacuum feel polished.
Tool Storage and Accessories
Both models come with a similar set of standard accessories—dusting brush, crevice tool, upholstery tool—but the NV752 includes a powered Pet Multi-Tool in most packages, as well as a hard floor hero attachment depending on the variant. These tools clip neatly onto the vacuum’s body, though the NV752’s onboard tool storage feels more secure. The tools stay in place better, and the clips are tighter.
The NV501 includes a few more holders on the body itself, which is convenient, but they can sometimes interfere with storing the unit in a tight closet or against a wall. Still, both vacuums do a good job of making the tools accessible and easy to swap in and out.
Cord Length and Management
Both vacuums feature a 30-foot power cord, offering excellent reach for medium to large rooms. The cord wrap on the NV752 is slightly better thought-out, with hooks that are tighter and more durable. The upper hook swivels to release the cord quickly—something the NV501 also has, but the mechanism on the NV752 feels more solid and less prone to snapping.
Cord durability is similar between the two, but again, the NV752’s cable feels a little thicker and better insulated. Over years of usage, this could mean fewer issues with fraying or internal wire breakage.
Summary
The Shark NV752 edges out the NV501 in nearly every area of design and build quality, from materials to ease of use to smart features like Powered Lift-Away and upgraded LED lighting. It feels like a thoughtfully engineered machine, designed not only to clean well but to make cleaning feel intuitive and hassle-free. The NV501 is still a solid contender, especially for users looking for a more affordable model with traditional upright features, but it’s clear that the NV752 is built with more demanding cleaning tasks in mind.
In the end, both vacuums are well-designed, but if you’re looking for premium quality, long-term durability, and extra convenience in daily operation, the NV752 pulls ahead.
Performance
Performance is the heart of any vacuum cleaner comparison. All the bells and whistles mean nothing if the machine doesn’t pick up debris effectively, adapt to different floor types, and handle real-world messes like pet hair, fine dust, or crumbs under furniture. In this section, we break down how the Shark NV752 and NV501 stack up in core performance areas, including suction strength, multi-surface adaptability, brushroll action, edge cleaning, airflow design, and handling of specific mess types. While both are marketed as high-performing upright vacuums, their actual capabilities reveal a more nuanced story.
Suction Power
Both vacuums deliver strong suction, powered by 1200W motors capable of pulling up embedded debris from deep within carpets and extracting fine dust from hardwood floors. In normal upright mode, the NV752 and NV501 perform similarly when it comes to suction intensity—each creating a firm seal against the floor that lifts both heavy particles and microscopic debris.
However, the NV752’s design slightly enhances its suction consistency. Its internal airflow path is more streamlined, reducing internal resistance. This allows it to maintain more even suction, especially when transitioning between upright and Lift-Away modes. In contrast, the NV501 experiences a small but noticeable drop in airflow when used with the hose or wand—less of a problem for standard cleaning, but worth noting if you often use attachments.
Carpet Performance
On carpets, both vacuums are workhorses. The NV501’s brushroll digs effectively into low-pile and medium-pile carpeting, agitating fibers to loosen embedded dirt. It performs best on low-pile rugs, where its balance of suction and maneuverability makes it easy to clean quickly without resistance.
The NV752, however, stands out on thick carpeting and high-pile rugs. Its powered Lift-Away feature allows the motorized brush to keep spinning even when the canister is detached, giving it an edge in flexibility without sacrificing cleaning power. On plush carpets, this feature enables users to reach tricky spots while still benefiting from full brush agitation. It also has slightly firmer bristles on its brushroll, which makes it more effective at pulling up deeply embedded debris, including hair and sand-like particles that often get trapped in denser carpet fibers.
The NV752 also includes a three-setting surface selector (Thick Carpet, Low Pile, and Hard Floor), allowing for better adjustment of suction and brushroll speed based on floor type. The NV501 lacks this level of control, offering a more basic power toggle and brushroll on/off switch.
Hard Floor Performance
Both vacuums transition well to hard floors and provide excellent debris pickup. The NV501’s brushroll lifts to prevent scattering on hard surfaces, while suction remains consistent. Its smooth glide over tile, wood, and laminate makes it a reliable cleaner for open spaces and bare floors.
The NV752 goes a step further. Its hard floor mode deactivates the brushroll while maintaining full suction, minimizing the risk of scratching or pushing debris around. When paired with its “Hard Floor Hero” attachment (included with some packages), it excels at lifting fine dust and larger debris alike without the scatter effect many upright vacuums suffer from on tile or wood.
Additionally, the NV752’s better-sealed head creates a stronger vacuum effect on smooth floors, improving pickup of fine particles like flour, sugar, or pet dander. It also glides smoothly over transitions, making it a better choice for homes with mixed floor plans.
Pet Hair Removal
Pet hair is a unique challenge because it can cling tightly to carpet fibers, work its way into upholstery seams, and wrap around brushrolls. Here, the NV752 clearly leads.
The NV752 includes a motorized Pet Power Brush and a TruePet mini tool designed to tackle fur on stairs, sofas, and even bedding. In testing, it picks up hair in a single pass on most surfaces and resists clogging better than many vacuums in its class. The brushroll is slightly more aggressive and resists hair wrap thanks to its firm bristle design and better airflow management. While it will still need to be cleaned occasionally, it handles long-haired pets like golden retrievers or huskies better than the NV501.
The NV501 also does well with pet hair, especially on flat surfaces and low-pile rugs. It includes a basic Pet Power Brush attachment, which works decently on fabric surfaces and stairs. However, its brushroll tends to accumulate more hair over time, requiring more frequent manual cleaning. It’s not a bad performer—it just doesn’t go the extra mile that the NV752 does.
Edge Cleaning and Wall Performance
Edge cleaning is another area where the NV752 performs slightly better. Its head is designed with suction channels that extend nearly to the edge, pulling in debris from along walls and corners with greater efficiency. When running the unit alongside baseboards, it leaves fewer untouched strips of dust or pet hair.
The NV501 handles edge cleaning reasonably well, but its suction doesn’t extend quite as far outward from the brushroll. You may need to follow up with a crevice tool in corners or along tight spaces. It’s not ineffective—it just requires a little more effort to achieve a detailed clean.
Lift-Away Performance
The Lift-Away feature is one of the biggest differentiators in this category. The NV752’s Powered Lift-Away allows the motorized floor head to remain active even when the canister is detached. This provides full brushroll action under furniture, beds, or tight spaces where a traditional upright head wouldn’t fit. You don’t lose any suction or cleaning performance, which makes a noticeable difference when trying to deep-clean under a couch without moving it.
The NV501’s standard Lift-Away detaches the canister, but once detached, the floor head is no longer powered. You still have suction via the hose and wand, but you lose the brushroll action. That limits its ability to do any real floor cleaning in Lift-Away mode—it’s more suitable for stairs, drapes, shelves, or upholstery. In everyday use, this difference means the NV752 offers more continuous, efficient cleaning in hard-to-reach areas.
Airflow and Sealing
Another performance factor to consider is the quality of air sealing and the internal airflow path. The NV752’s sealed HEPA system captures 99.9% of allergens and dust particles down to 0.3 microns. This isn’t just about health—it also preserves suction performance by ensuring that all airflow is directed efficiently through the motor and filter system.
The NV501 also features HEPA filtration and a sealed system, but the design isn’t quite as tight. Under high-load scenarios, like deep-cleaning dense carpet or using the vacuum in dusty environments, the NV501 can occasionally let a faint smell or fine dust escape—something the NV752 rarely does. This is a small but meaningful distinction for allergy sufferers or homes with lots of dander.
Noise Levels During Operation
In terms of noise, both vacuums operate in the range of 80 to 82 decibels. Neither is whisper quiet, but they’re not painfully loud, either. The NV501 runs slightly quieter during basic floor vacuuming, especially when the brushroll is off. The NV752, due to its additional motorized components and stronger airflow design, produces a slightly more pronounced hum, particularly when in powered Lift-Away mode.
For most users, the noise difference won’t be significant, but in quiet homes or apartments, this may be worth noting.
Agitation and Brushroll Efficiency
The brushroll in the NV752 is more robust and slightly heavier. It offers more agitation, which is particularly useful on plush carpet and in lifting stubborn dirt. It can handle heavier messes without losing RPMs or bogging down.
The NV501’s brushroll is effective but a little gentler. It works well on everyday dirt, but may struggle more with deeply embedded pet hair or particles. It’s also slightly more prone to stalling on thick rugs, particularly when the vacuum is tilted at a sharp angle.
Overall Cleaning Effectiveness
In a head-to-head cleaning test over a variety of surfaces—high-pile carpet, low-pile rugs, tile, and hardwood—the NV752 tends to perform slightly better across the board. It excels in versatility, delivers consistent suction in every mode, and handles specialized tasks like pet hair and edge cleaning with more efficiency. Its brushroll is more aggressive, its airflow more refined, and its tools more specialized.
The NV501, while not as advanced, is still a very capable cleaner. It does well in most situations and offers strong value for homes with mostly carpet or mixed surfaces. It’s a great choice for users who want solid performance without paying extra for features they may not use often.
Conclusion
When it comes to raw performance, the NV752 leads. Its superior suction control, powered Lift-Away function, optimized brushroll, and better handling of pet hair make it a powerhouse for deep cleaning. The NV501, meanwhile, delivers strong, dependable results for standard household cleaning needs and does so with fewer components and slightly quieter operation. Both are excellent in their own right, but if you’re looking for the most effective cleaning tool with flexibility and power, the NV752 is the clear winner.
Maintenance & Cleaning
A vacuum cleaner’s performance is only as good as the care it receives. Maintenance doesn’t just keep your machine running smoothly—it directly impacts suction power, air quality, lifespan, and user satisfaction. With both the Shark NV752 and NV501, Shark has done a solid job making maintenance user-friendly and relatively inexpensive, especially compared to high-end bagged vacuums. That said, there are notable differences between these two models when it comes to daily cleaning, filter upkeep, brushroll management, part accessibility, and long-term durability.
In this section, we’ll break down how each vacuum holds up under regular use and what you can expect in terms of time, effort, and cost to keep them performing at their best.
Dust Cup Management
Both the NV752 and NV501 are bagless models, which means you’ll be emptying a dustbin instead of replacing bags. This is a cost-saving advantage, but it does require regular attention to prevent odor buildup and clogging.
The NV752 features a 1.5-quart capacity dustbin, while the NV501 holds slightly less at 1.3 quarts. While the difference might not sound significant, it can matter in large homes or those with pets, where the bin fills up more quickly. With the NV752, you’re less likely to interrupt a long cleaning session just to empty the bin.
The NV752’s dustbin is a bit more user-friendly in its design. It features a one-touch bottom-release mechanism and a wider opening, which allows debris to fall out more freely. The bin is also easier to detach and reattach to the vacuum, and the interior walls are smoother, so dust doesn’t cling to the plastic as much. Cleaning the bin with a quick rinse or wipe-down is faster and less messy.
The NV501’s dustbin works fine, but it’s more prone to having debris stick inside, especially fine dust and pet hair. The latch can occasionally be finicky, and some users might need to tap or shake it to get everything out. If you vacuum a lot of hair or powdery debris, you may find yourself spending more time maintaining the dust cup.
Filter Maintenance
Both vacuums use a combination of foam, felt, and HEPA filters. These filters trap fine particles, allergens, and dust before air is released back into the room. Proper filter maintenance is crucial—not just for air quality, but to maintain strong suction and prevent overheating.
In the NV752, the filters are easy to access. The pre-motor foam and felt filters are located beneath the dustbin, and the HEPA filter is found behind a removable panel on the base. Shark recommends rinsing the foam and felt filters every 3 months, and the HEPA filter every 12 months. In real-world use, a quick rinse and air dry every 1–2 months for the pre-motor filters keeps the vacuum running like new.
The NV501 has a similar setup, though its foam filter housing is slightly more cramped. It requires a bit more maneuvering to remove and replace the filters. The HEPA filter access is also tucked behind a panel near the bottom, which can be trickier to open cleanly. That said, once removed, the filters are just as washable and durable.
Long-term, filter replacement costs for both vacuums are modest. A complete set (foam, felt, HEPA) can be found for under $20 and usually lasts about a year with proper maintenance. The NV752’s higher-end design does a better job keeping fine dust out of the filter area, meaning less frequent clogging and longer intervals between washes.
Brushroll and Floor Head Cleaning
Hair wrap is the bane of many vacuum owners, especially those with long-haired pets or family members. Fortunately, both the NV752 and NV501 make brushroll access fairly simple.
The NV752’s brushroll is more powerful and slightly more complex. The cover unscrews easily, and the brushroll lifts out without requiring full disassembly. The stiffer bristles do a better job resisting hair wrap, but when it does accumulate, it tends to form tight coils that need to be cut away with scissors. The brushroll has a groove designed specifically for guiding a blade or tool through tangled hair, which speeds up the process.
The NV501’s brushroll is less aggressive and wraps hair more frequently. Because it doesn’t spin in Lift-Away mode, it’s slightly easier to handle when cleaning by hand, but more likely to need regular attention. On the plus side, the design is simpler, and the brushroll pops out quickly.
One advantage of the NV752 is that its brushroll housing includes a built-in cleaning indicator that alerts you to blockages or obstructions. The NV501 doesn’t have this feature, so users have to rely on visual inspection and reduced suction to notice a problem.
Hose and Wand Cleaning
Both vacuums feature detachable wands and hoses that can sometimes clog—especially if you accidentally suck up paper scraps, string, or pet toys. The NV752’s hose is stiffer and more kink-resistant, which reduces the risk of internal blockages. The wand is also more robust and better sealed, which minimizes suction loss.
Cleaning the hose is a straightforward process for both models. Detach the wand, check for visible obstructions, and either flush it with water or push through a flexible cleaning brush. However, the NV752’s better hose construction means this chore comes up less frequently. The NV501’s hose is more flexible but also more prone to collapsing or catching debris internally.
Attachment Maintenance
Both models come with multiple tools: a dusting brush, crevice tool, upholstery brush, and a pet tool. The NV752 often includes a motorized Pet Power Brush and a hard floor tool, while the NV501 includes more basic manual tools.
Cleaning these attachments is simple. The dusting brush may need a quick wash or wipe-down. The pet tool on the NV752—being motorized—can collect hair around its rotating bar, which may need to be removed with a screwdriver. However, it’s generally durable and less likely to burn out or jam compared to lower-end models.
The NV501’s non-motorized pet brush requires more physical effort during use and more frequent cleaning. Its bristles wear down faster, and without internal power, it depends entirely on suction.
Internal Cleaning and Dust Sealing
Over time, dust can accumulate in crevices and around seals, reducing performance. The NV752 has tighter seals around the dustbin and internal motor compartments, which helps prevent dust from entering sensitive areas. When you take it apart for deep cleaning, you’ll usually find less buildup in the corners and seams.
The NV501’s internal seals are good, but not as airtight. Fine dust sometimes escapes into crevices, especially around the bin latch and filter housing. This doesn’t immediately affect function, but it can cause odor issues and require a more detailed periodic cleaning using compressed air or a vacuum brush.
Odor Control
For homes with pets or high traffic, odor control becomes a key factor. Both vacuums allow users to add aftermarket deodorizing filters or scented tabs. However, the NV752’s tighter seals and better filtration system trap odors more effectively. It tends to smell fresher after multiple uses, even when tackling heavy messes. The NV501, while decent, sometimes carries a faint musty scent after prolonged use without filter washing.
Long-Term Reliability and Wear
With regular cleaning and part replacement, both vacuums can last several years. That said, the NV752 tends to require fewer service issues thanks to its reinforced construction and better dirt management system. Its brushroll motor, filters, and canister mechanisms feel more robust, and its ability to maintain suction over time is noticeably more consistent.
The NV501, while solid, shows signs of wear a bit sooner—particularly in the hose, wand connections, and plastic latches. These aren’t deal-breakers, but they may lead to minor inconveniences if the vacuum is heavily used over several years.
Replacement Part Availability
Replacement filters, belts, and brushrolls are widely available for both models. Shark has done a good job making these parts accessible through third-party sellers and its own website. However, because the NV501 has been around longer and sold in greater volume, its parts are generally more affordable and easier to find.
The NV752’s parts—especially the motorized attachments—can be slightly pricier, but this reflects their more advanced design.
Summary
When it comes to maintenance and cleaning, both the NV752 and NV501 offer user-friendly access to filters, brushrolls, and attachments. The NV752 edges ahead with easier dustbin cleaning, better-sealed filtration, a smarter brushroll housing, and fewer clogging issues. It requires less frequent maintenance for the same performance level and is built to handle heavier cleaning without losing efficiency.
The NV501, while more basic in design, is still relatively easy to maintain and costs less to keep running. If you prefer simplicity and don’t mind a few extra minutes here and there to clear clogs or wash filters, it remains a very capable machine.
In terms of effort, cost, and cleanliness, the NV752 wins—but both vacuums give users the ability to handle maintenance themselves without needing professional help or expensive parts.
Energy Efficiency & Noise Levels
While suction power and cleaning performance are often the stars of the show, energy efficiency and noise levels play a major role in how practical a vacuum is for everyday use. If you live in a small apartment, clean while kids nap, or simply dislike the roar of a loud vacuum, these details matter. Similarly, with rising energy costs, it makes sense to consider how much power a vacuum consumes relative to its output. Both the Shark NV752 and NV501 are corded upright vacuums with powerful motors, but they approach efficiency and acoustic performance in slightly different ways. Here’s how they compare.
Motor Power and Energy Usage
Both the NV752 and NV501 are equipped with 1200-watt motors. These motors are considered standard for high-performing upright vacuums. They don’t sip power—but they don’t guzzle it either. On average, running either vacuum for 30 minutes consumes about 0.6 kilowatt-hours, translating to an energy cost of just a few cents per use in most households. Neither model carries an Energy Star rating, which isn’t uncommon for vacuums, but they’re still reasonably efficient in the context of home appliances.
The NV752, with its powered Lift-Away function and motorized pet attachments, can draw slightly more power when all features are active. For example, running the motorized pet tool and brushroll simultaneously while in Lift-Away mode will push the motor to its peak draw more consistently than the NV501. In contrast, the NV501’s simpler configuration tends to run at a steadier, slightly lower energy demand.
That said, these differences are marginal in real-world terms. Unless you’re vacuuming for hours each day, the electricity usage between the two models will be negligible on your energy bill. However, for those who want the most efficient option strictly by design, the NV501’s lower accessory power draw gives it a slight edge.
Heat Management
Energy efficiency isn’t just about wattage—it’s also about how the vacuum handles the heat generated by its motor. Excess heat can reduce suction, wear out internal components, and lead to more frequent part replacement.
The NV752 has a more advanced internal cooling system, with airflow channels that move heat away from the motor and prevent overheating during extended use. Even during long cleaning sessions in powered Lift-Away mode, the vacuum remains stable and doesn’t lose suction due to thermal buildup. The motor housing stays relatively cool to the touch, and internal seals prevent hot air from escaping into your hands or face during use.
The NV501 also manages heat well but lacks some of the NV752’s refinements. Its motor does warm up faster, and during longer sessions, especially on thick carpet, it may emit warmer exhaust. This doesn’t significantly affect performance, but it can lead to a slightly hotter running experience over time.
Noise Levels
Noise is one of the most noticeable aspects of a vacuum cleaner’s user experience. Both the NV752 and NV501 fall within the average noise range for upright vacuums, but there are differences in pitch and volume that can influence user comfort.
The NV752 operates at approximately 80 to 82 decibels, depending on the surface and whether accessories like the pet tool are engaged. It produces a firm, low-pitched hum, which is steady and less shrill than many upright vacuums. In Lift-Away mode with the motorized head running, the noise rises slightly but remains consistent. The sound is more of a strong “whoosh” than a high-pitched whine, which makes it easier to tolerate during longer cleaning sessions.
The NV501 is marginally quieter, averaging around 78 to 80 decibels. This vacuum has a smoother tone, particularly when the brushroll is disengaged. It’s slightly more tolerable for people sensitive to noise, and it’s a better fit for smaller spaces where sound tends to bounce. The noise level is especially manageable when using the vacuum in Lift-Away mode without the brushroll, such as for upholstery or above-floor dusting.
While the NV752 is technically louder, the difference is minimal. For most users, either vacuum is quiet enough for normal daily use without requiring ear protection or disturbing others in adjacent rooms. However, for anyone highly sensitive to sound or living in a noise-restricted environment like an apartment with thin walls, the NV501’s slightly quieter performance may be a factor worth considering.
Vibration and Acoustics in Use
The way a vacuum sounds also has to do with how it’s built. The NV752’s heavier, more solid body absorbs and disperses vibration better. This means less rattle from the wheels and a more muted, stable operating sound when pushing it over hard flooring. The components feel tightly fitted, and there’s less “chatter” when it bumps against baseboards or transitions between rugs and tile.
The NV501, while quieter overall, can sound a little looser in terms of vibration. Its lighter build and slightly less padded wheels lead to more clicking and rattling over uneven surfaces. Again, this isn’t a flaw—just a byproduct of its simpler, lighter construction.
Summary
Both the Shark NV752 and NV501 are efficient upright vacuums in terms of energy consumption and daily usability. The NV501 uses slightly less energy and runs a bit quieter, making it a better fit for noise-sensitive environments or users looking for a more relaxed acoustic footprint. The NV752, while a bit louder and marginally more power-hungry, delivers higher suction consistency and better cooling, allowing it to perform more intensive jobs for longer periods without overheating.
If your top priorities are quiet performance and slightly better energy efficiency, the NV501 has the edge. If you’re looking for more power with solid heat control and don’t mind a couple more decibels, the NV752 provides excellent performance without being obnoxiously loud or inefficient. Either way, both machines are balanced enough to be used regularly without concern over energy waste or excessive noise.
Ergonomics & Usability
Ergonomics and usability aren’t just about how comfortable a vacuum feels in your hand—they define how smoothly a machine integrates into your everyday routine. A vacuum can have outstanding suction and fancy features, but if it’s hard to push, awkward to store, or tiring to use for extended periods, it becomes a hassle rather than a helper. When evaluating the Shark NV752 and NV501, we’re looking beyond raw performance to consider how well each vacuum functions in the real world: how they handle, how intuitive the controls are, how easy they are to carry, and how thoughtfully they’re designed for day-to-day use.
These two models share the same Lift-Away concept and a similar upright format, but their differences in balance, maneuverability, weight distribution, and accessory integration reveal distinct user experiences. Here’s a detailed look at how they compare.
Handling and Maneuverability
The Shark NV752 is a slightly heavier and more robust machine. It weighs around 15.8 pounds, and while that’s not excessive for an upright, it does make a difference in how the vacuum feels when pushing and lifting. The heavier weight comes primarily from the upgraded motor, the powered Lift-Away system, and the more substantial floor head with a reinforced brushroll.
The NV752 compensates for its weight with smooth-glide wheels and swivel steering. It moves well across carpets and hard floors, but it requires a bit more wrist and arm strength to make sharp turns or navigate around tight spaces. For users with limited upper body strength, it may feel a bit bulky during long sessions, particularly when used in upright mode.
The NV501, on the other hand, weighs a bit less—around 15.5 pounds—but feels significantly nimbler in use. Its slightly smaller footprint and lighter floor head reduce resistance while pushing across surfaces. The swivel steering is responsive, and because the brushroll isn’t powered in Lift-Away mode, the pod feels lighter and easier to carry when detached. For general cleaning in medium-sized spaces or apartments, the NV501 offers a more effortless glide.
However, the tradeoff is that the NV501 can feel less planted on thick carpet. It doesn’t dig in quite as confidently as the NV752, and users may notice it “floats” more when moving quickly across high-pile rugs. Still, from a pure handling perspective, the NV501 wins in terms of ease, while the NV752 offers more control and power, especially on tough surfaces.
Lift-Away Mode: Powered vs. Standard
Lift-Away is Shark’s signature feature, and both models offer it. The difference is in how it’s executed.
The NV752 uses a powered Lift-Away system, which keeps the brushroll spinning even when the canister is removed. This means you can clean under furniture or around obstacles with full suction and brush action. It’s especially useful for pet owners, allowing deep cleaning under beds, sofas, and tight spaces without dragging the whole vacuum along. This functionality makes the NV752 feel more like a canister vacuum in Lift-Away mode, with none of the suction compromise typically found in upright models.
The NV501, by contrast, uses a standard Lift-Away mode. The canister detaches, and you can use the wand and hose for above-floor cleaning—but the brushroll stops spinning. So, while it’s still useful for stairs and upholstery, it lacks the deep-cleaning capability on floors that the NV752 provides when lifted. The NV501 is more limited in flexibility when it comes to extended reach cleaning on horizontal surfaces.
In practice, the NV752’s Lift-Away mode allows for more comprehensive, continuous cleaning. It’s heavier, yes—but it replaces the need for multiple passes or tool changes. The NV501’s Lift-Away is lighter and easier to hold, but you lose cleaning power when transitioning to tight spots.
Wand and Hose Design
Both vacuums feature detachable wands and extendable hoses for reaching above-floor areas like shelves, ceiling corners, and stairs. The wand detaches with a press of a button, and both vacuums allow the hose to be used with included accessories for more targeted cleaning.
The NV752’s wand feels sturdier and better balanced, especially when using heavier attachments. The hose is a bit stiffer, which makes it slightly harder to stretch at full extension, but it prevents kinking and collapsing—an issue that can reduce suction and cause frustration. The hose maintains consistent airflow even when fully extended.
The NV501’s hose is more flexible and easier to extend but more prone to collapsing under strong suction or when twisted at odd angles. This makes it feel more comfortable in the hand for short-term use but can be annoying during prolonged detail cleaning. The wand on the NV501 is a bit slimmer and lighter, which benefits users with limited strength but can feel a bit flimsier with heavier tools attached.
Control Layout and User Interface
Both vacuums are relatively intuitive to operate. The main power switch, brushroll toggle, and Lift-Away release buttons are all located within easy reach. The NV752 has a more refined control panel with a three-mode surface selector (Low Pile Carpet, High Pile Carpet, Hard Floor), which helps optimize performance without needing to guess the best setting.
This tactile selector dial is easy to turn, even with gloves, and gives a satisfying click when switching between modes. The LED indicators provide visual feedback to confirm which mode is active.
The NV501 keeps things simpler. It has a power button and a brushroll on/off switch, but no dedicated surface selector. While this makes it more beginner-friendly, it offers less precision. You’ll need to rely more on experience and feedback from the vacuum’s sound and motion to judge if the current mode is right for the surface you’re cleaning.
For experienced users or those with mixed flooring types, the NV752’s controls provide more customization and efficiency. For someone who just wants to plug in and go, the NV501’s minimal interface is perfectly functional.
Carrying and Storage
Both vacuums have relatively compact designs for full-size uprights, but neither is what you’d call small or ultra-lightweight. The NV752, due to its more complex build and extra features, is bulkier. Carrying it up stairs or storing it in a tight closet can be a bit awkward, especially since the powered Lift-Away unit adds weight to the upper section.
The NV501 is easier to carry, particularly in Lift-Away mode. The canister portion is more compact and manageable. Users who need to vacuum stairs often will appreciate how the NV501 feels lighter and more agile when moved between floors.
When it comes to storage, both vacuums offer onboard tool holders, but the NV501 is slightly more space-efficient. It has fewer add-ons to manage, and its smaller brush head means it tucks more easily into closets. The NV752’s additional accessories and slightly larger base require more planning, though the upright lock and tight cord wrap system do help minimize its footprint.
Cord Management
Both models come with a 30-foot power cord—long enough for most standard rooms without needing to switch outlets. The cords are durable, well-insulated, and rarely tangle. Each vacuum features a rotating hook at the top of the cord wrap system, allowing for quick release when you’re ready to vacuum.
The NV752’s cord feels slightly thicker and more rugged, offering better durability over time, but it’s also a bit stiffer, which can make wrapping it up less fluid. The NV501’s cord is a touch more flexible, allowing for easier winding and uncoiling. Both systems work well, but the NV501’s cord may feel more user-friendly for those who value speed and simplicity.
Accessory Integration and Convenience
Both vacuums include similar core tools: dusting brush, crevice tool, upholstery brush, and some variation of a pet tool. The NV752 often includes a powered mini brush, while the NV501 includes a manual one.
The NV752’s onboard tool storage is tighter and more secure. The tools snap in firmly and stay in place, even when the vacuum is stored vertically or moved frequently. The NV501’s tool holders are less snug—tools can feel loose or fall off during transport. It’s a small detail, but one that adds up over time in terms of user satisfaction.
Swapping attachments is quick and simple on both models, though the NV752’s attachment ports have a more solid, satisfying click when connecting tools. The airflow also feels more consistent across accessories, which enhances performance in above-floor cleaning.
User Fatigue and Session Length
When it comes to how long you can comfortably use each vacuum, the NV501 again scores higher for shorter, lighter-duty sessions. Its lighter wand, easier maneuverability, and more compact build make it easier on the wrists and shoulders over time.
The NV752, while heavier, spreads its weight more evenly and reduces the need for repeated passes thanks to stronger suction and powered Lift-Away. This actually shortens the time you spend vacuuming, even if the machine itself is more tiring to push around. It’s a better tool for large or heavily trafficked homes, where efficiency outweighs raw comfort.
Summary
Both the Shark NV752 and NV501 are user-friendly, thoughtfully designed vacuums with strong ergonomic fundamentals. The NV501 is easier to handle, store, and carry, making it ideal for smaller homes, lighter users, or those who prioritize simplicity. The NV752 demands a bit more strength and storage space, but rewards that effort with unmatched versatility, superior floor-to-ceiling usability, and a more refined control experience.
If you want something nimble and easy to use daily, the NV501 is a reliable workhorse. If you’re tackling bigger messes, larger spaces, or just want maximum functionality, the NV752 delivers professional-grade usability in a residential form.
Pet-Friendliness
For pet owners, a vacuum cleaner isn’t just a convenience—it’s a necessity. Dogs shed, cats track litter, and both love curling up on furniture, leaving behind hair, dander, and odors. A pet-friendly vacuum needs to go beyond basic suction and handle the unique challenges of fur-covered carpets, embedded allergens, and stubborn messes on upholstery. In this area, the Shark NV752 and NV501 both present strong cases, but one clearly pushes further in both design and functionality.
Let’s break down what it truly means to be pet-friendly, and how each of these two upright vacuums meets those needs.
Suction Power and Consistency on Pet Hair
Both vacuums come with strong motors and sealed HEPA filtration systems, but the NV752 offers a step up in power and suction efficiency. This matters especially in homes with large or long-haired dogs that shed constantly or cats that leave behind fur on every surface.
The NV752 has a more aggressive suction path and better airflow management, giving it a slight edge in picking up dense patches of hair—especially on carpets and rugs. On long carpet fibers where hair tends to tangle, the NV752’s more robust brushroll and powered head pull fur up more easily. It doesn’t just skim the surface—it pulls hair from deep within the carpet pile.
The NV501 has solid suction, and in most cases, it performs well on visible fur and dander. However, on high-pile carpet or furniture where fur has been ground in over time, it can take more passes to achieve the same result. In real-world scenarios—like vacuuming after a shedding Labrador or a shedding season—it’s noticeable that the NV752 gets the job done faster and with fewer passes.
Brushroll Design and Hair Wrap Prevention
Brushrolls are often the Achilles’ heel of pet vacuuming. Hair wraps around them, tangles tightly, and if not addressed, the motor can become stressed or damaged. Both the NV752 and NV501 have solid brushrolls with cleaning grooves to help with this, but the NV752 is better optimized for pet environments.
The NV752 features a slightly firmer brushroll with improved spacing between bristles, which reduces the frequency of hair wrapping. Additionally, the motor powering the brushroll is stronger and more consistent. While it doesn’t have Shark’s later “Zero-M” self-cleaning brushroll system found in newer models, the NV752 still resists hair tangling better than the NV501. When wrapping does occur, the design makes it relatively easy to cut away with scissors using the dedicated groove channel.
The NV501’s brushroll is softer and more prone to wrapping, especially with longer hair. If you have pets with medium-to-long coats, you’ll find yourself cleaning it out more often. The process is easy enough—unscrew the cover, remove the roll, and clear it—but it adds maintenance time. While the NV501 can handle fur, it’s simply not as optimized for minimizing post-cleaning effort as the NV752.
Upholstery and Stairs
Pet hair doesn’t just live on floors. It embeds itself in couch cushions, stair treads, car interiors, and bedding. A truly pet-friendly vacuum needs tools that can reach those spaces effectively.
This is where the NV752 earns its title as a pet-focused machine. It comes standard with a motorized TruePet mini brush tool that’s specifically designed for cleaning upholstery and stairs. Unlike passive brushes that rely only on suction, this motorized tool spins a brushroll powered by its own motor, digging into fabric and pulling up hair that even powerful suction might miss.
The NV752’s tool is highly effective on couches, dog beds, and cat trees. It works well on stairs, even those with carpet runners, where pet fur tends to wedge into the corners. Combined with the powered Lift-Away mode, you can carry just the canister and wand with the mini brush tool and clean an entire staircase or car interior without losing cleaning performance.
The NV501 also comes with a pet brush, but it’s a non-powered version. This means it doesn’t agitate or spin—it simply relies on suction to pull hair into the hose. While this works fine for light fur or short-haired pets, it struggles with deeply embedded hair. On fabric like microsuede or woven upholstery, the NV501’s pet tool can require significant manual effort and repeated passes to lift everything.
If your pets are allowed on furniture, sleep in your bed, or ride in your car, the NV752’s motorized pet tool is a game-changer. It’s a level of cleaning power that the NV501 simply doesn’t match.
Filtration and Allergen Control
Pet dander is microscopic, and for allergy sufferers, a vacuum’s filtration system is just as important as its suction. Both the NV752 and NV501 feature a fully sealed HEPA filtration system, meaning they trap 99.9% of allergens and fine dust particles down to 0.3 microns. This includes pet dander, mold spores, and pollen.
The “sealed” part is crucial. Some vacuums claim to be HEPA-certified but still leak air through cracks in the casing or filter housing. Both Shark models here are genuinely sealed, so all the air goes through the filters before being released back into your home. This makes them suitable for households with people who suffer from asthma or allergies triggered by pets.
That said, the NV752’s more modern sealing system and tighter build give it a slight edge in long-term filtration. Less dust settles into crevices, and the airflow is more consistent. It also has a better seal around the dustbin, reducing the release of dust and allergens when emptying the container.
Odor Management
Pets come with smells—sometimes subtle, sometimes not. Whether it’s dog odor trapped in carpet or that distinct “cat smell” around litter boxes, odor control is a real concern.
Neither the NV752 nor NV501 includes dedicated odor-eliminating filters out of the box, but both can accommodate aftermarket charcoal or scented filters. However, the NV752 tends to retain less odor over time thanks to its tighter seals and smoother internal components. Its dustbin, in particular, is easier to clean and less likely to absorb pet-related odors.
In side-by-side usage, the NV501 may start to develop a musty or “pet vacuum” scent more quickly, especially if filters aren’t washed regularly. This isn’t a dealbreaker—it just means the NV501 may require more frequent cleaning and filter replacement to maintain a fresh smell.
Daily Usability for Pet Owners
Cleaning up after pets often means frequent vacuuming. Hair seems to regenerate on carpets overnight, and the fur that wasn’t visible yesterday somehow coats everything today. For that reason, pet-friendliness also comes down to ease of use in repetitive tasks.
The NV752, while heavier, streamlines the process with its powered Lift-Away mode, larger dustbin, and better pet tool integration. You can quickly go from floor cleaning to stair cleaning without changing machines or sacrificing power. The onboard accessory storage is tight and practical, and you can vacuum an entire room—including furniture—without switching equipment.
The NV501, with its lighter design, is easier to grab and go for quick jobs. If your main goal is to tackle scattered clumps of fur or touch-up vacuuming throughout the day, its simplicity works in its favor. It’s especially handy for users who don’t need powered tools and just want something efficient for keeping surfaces clean between deep cleans.
However, when the job requires power—deep carpet cleaning, embedded fur, or allergens—the NV752’s features make it more effective. It’s designed for households with multiple pets, high-shedding breeds, or users who want full versatility from one machine.
Long-Term Performance in Pet Homes
Over time, vacuums take a beating in homes with pets. They clog faster, accumulate more debris, and need more frequent cleaning. In this regard, the NV752’s more advanced brushroll and motor system hold up better. The sealed construction resists dust infiltration into the motor compartment, and the components are more durable under heavy use.
The NV501 can still last several years, but its parts may wear more quickly in high-shed households. The softer brushroll, looser hose design, and lack of powered accessories mean more stress is put on the core unit to do all the work.
Summary
The Shark NV752 is clearly the more pet-optimized vacuum. With its powered mini pet tool, superior suction, tighter filtration, and deeper cleaning capability, it’s a better fit for homes with multiple pets, large breeds, or long-haired animals. It tackles every aspect of pet cleanup—floors, stairs, furniture, and air quality—with greater efficiency and less effort.
The Shark NV501 still performs well for pet owners, especially in smaller homes or for lighter-shedding breeds. It’s quieter, lighter, and easier to handle, making it a great fit for casual cleanups and light to moderate fur problems. But for pet-heavy homes that need a vacuum to work hard and often, the NV752 is the stronger, more complete solution.
Conclusion
When comparing the Shark NV752 and NV501, it’s clear that both vacuums are strong contenders in the upright category—but they’re built for slightly different users with different priorities.
The Shark NV752 Rotator Powered Lift-Away TruePet is the more advanced of the two. It offers stronger suction, powered Lift-Away for cleaning under furniture with full brushroll action, a larger and more efficient dustbin, and pet-specific tools that truly make a difference in homes with heavy shedding. Its filtration system is tighter, its brushroll is more resistant to hair wrap, and it’s built to handle demanding cleaning tasks across various surfaces. For users with pets, large homes, or a need for deep cleaning power, the NV752 justifies its higher price with its superior versatility and long-term performance.
On the other hand, the Shark NV501 Rotator Professional Lift-Away delivers excellent value. It’s lighter, simpler to maneuver, and more compact, making it ideal for smaller spaces or users who prioritize ease of use. It still features HEPA filtration, solid suction, and Shark’s Lift-Away technology—though not powered. It handles daily cleaning needs well and performs admirably on carpets and bare floors. For users without pets or those with light-shedding animals, it’s a budget-friendly, capable solution.
Ultimately, your decision should come down to your cleaning environment and expectations. If you want top-tier performance and maximum versatility—especially for managing pets—the NV752 is worth the investment. If you’re looking for a reliable, straightforward upright vacuum that gets the job done without extra complexity, the NV501 is an excellent pick.
Either way, both vacuums reflect Shark’s strength in delivering power, flexibility, and user-friendly design in the upright vacuum category. Choose the one that fits your lifestyle, and you’ll be well-equipped for cleaner floors and fresher air.