Shark NV360 vs Shark NV752

Shark NV360 vs Shark NV752

Choosing between two vacuum cleaners that look similar on the surface can be trickier than it seems. Shark makes a wide range of uprights, and two of its most popular are the Shark NV360 Navigator Lift-Away Deluxe and the Shark NV752 Rotator Powered Lift-Away TruePet. At first glance, they share the same Shark DNA: both are upright vacuums with “Lift-Away” pods, bagless canisters, sealed filtration systems, and a reputation for solid cleaning performance. But in practice, they’re aimed at slightly different buyers. The NV360 is marketed as a reliable, budget-friendly option that gives you strong everyday cleaning power without piling on extras. The NV752, on the other hand, steps things up with a sturdier build, more suction through the hose, pet-specific attachments, and extra touches like LED headlights. This review breaks down their differences in detail so you can confidently decide which one fits your home best.

Shark NV360 vs Shark NV752 Comparison Chart

If you click the links below, under the product images, you will be redirected to Amazon.com. In case you then decide to buy anything, Amazon.com will pay me a commission. This doesn’t affect the honesty of this review in any way though.

Feature / SpecShark NV360 (Navigator Lift-Away Deluxe)Shark NV752 (Rotator Powered Lift-Away TruePet)
Shark NV360Shark NV752
Check the best price on AmazonCheck the best price on Amazon
Vacuum TypeUpright with Lift-Away podUpright with Powered Lift-Away pod
Weight~12.5 lbs~15.4 lbs
Dimensions (HxWxD)45.5 x 12 x 15 inches46.1 x 12.1 x 12.2 inches
Dustbin Capacity0.9 quarts1.5 quarts
Filtration SystemAnti-Allergen Complete Seal + HEPA filterAnti-Allergen Complete Seal + HEPA filter
Motor Power~1200 watts~1200 watts (higher suction output)
Cord Length25 feet30 feet
Hose Length5.5 feet6.0 feet
Cleaning Path Width11 inches10.5 inches
Brushroll TypeStandard bristle brushrollAdvanced bristle brushroll + motorized pet tool
Lift-Away FunctionYes (non-powered)Yes (Powered Lift-Away)
Noise LevelModerate, slightly higher-pitchedSlightly louder, deeper hum
Floor CompatibilityCarpets, hard floors, area rugsCarpets, hard floors, area rugs, upholstery
Special Tools IncludedUpholstery tool, crevice tool, dusting brushTruePet motorized brush, pet multi-tool, crevice tool, dusting brush
Swivel SteeringYesYes (enhanced with Rotator technology)
LED HeadlightsNoYes (on floor nozzle and handle)
Pet Hair PerformanceDecent on surfaces, less effective on upholsteryExcellent, designed for heavy pet households
Warranty5 years (varies by retailer)7 years (varies by retailer)
My individual reviewsShark NV360 reviewShark NV752 review

Design & Build Quality

When comparing the Shark NV360 and the Shark NV752, it’s immediately clear that both vacuums carry the familiar Shark upright DNA, but they diverge significantly in how they are built, the feel of their components, and the overall impression of sturdiness. Design and build quality aren’t just about whether a vacuum looks nice sitting in the corner of your living room—they influence how comfortable it is to use, how durable it will be after years of cleaning, and whether small details like the hinge, handle, or hose connection will become annoying or remain dependable.

Overall design philosophy

The NV360 belongs to Shark’s Navigator line. Navigators tend to prioritize being lightweight and practical, focusing on maneuverability and affordability without loading on too many bells and whistles. You notice this in the NV360’s slimmer profile, smaller dirt bin, and reliance on basic plastic finishes. It’s designed to be a workhorse in day-to-day cleaning, particularly appealing to people who want straightforward functionality rather than gadgetry.

The NV752, part of the Rotator series, is a more premium proposition. The Rotator models are designed with extra features, larger bases, and a somewhat more robust build. They often include cosmetic flourishes such as LED headlights and a slightly more polished, “higher-end” look. The NV752 carries that identity well, with sturdier-feeling plastics, a broader cleaning head, and design elements that convey it was made to tackle more demanding households—especially ones with pets.

Materials and construction

Both vacuums are primarily constructed from durable ABS plastic, which is standard in the industry for keeping weight manageable. The difference lies in the thickness and finish of the materials. On the NV360, some of the plastic pieces, especially around the dust bin and hose connection points, feel thinner. While not flimsy, they give the impression that you need to treat the vacuum a little more carefully to avoid cracking or snapping under heavy stress. The handle is functional but basic, and the dirt canister latch has a slightly looser feel compared to the NV752.

By contrast, the NV752’s parts feel denser and more polished. The hinge where the vacuum head meets the body feels sturdier, and the clear dust cup is reinforced with more substantial framing. The release mechanisms for the Lift-Away function and the dust bin are also firmer, offering a more secure “click” that adds to the impression of durability. Even the plastic wheels feel more robust, rolling more smoothly and with less wobble.

Size and footprint

In terms of size, the NV360 is more compact. Its narrower base means it can snake between furniture and store more easily in tight closets. This is an advantage if you live in a smaller home or apartment where storage space is at a premium. The NV752 is bulkier, with a wider cleaning path and a slightly taller stature. While that adds weight, it also gives the vacuum a more commanding presence on carpets and allows it to cover ground faster in open areas.

The trade-off here is storage convenience. The NV360 tucks away into tight spaces, while the NV752 might demand a dedicated corner or a closet with a bit more clearance. If you’ve ever struggled with fitting a bulky vacuum into a small hall closet, this difference matters.

Weight and portability

Weight is another dimension of build quality that affects design. The NV360, being lighter, is easier to carry up stairs and move between rooms. This design choice makes sense for buyers who want simplicity and may need to lift the unit frequently. The NV752 is heavier, but its design anticipates that weight by including better balance and sturdier handles. When carried in Lift-Away mode, the NV752 feels solid in hand, though you’ll notice the heft compared to the NV360.

For households with multiple floors, the lighter NV360 is easier to manage, while the NV752’s added weight will be forgiven by those who value its sturdier build and superior suction power.

Lift-Away functionality

Both vacuums incorporate Shark’s Lift-Away technology, allowing the central canister to detach from the base for more portable cleaning. In terms of design execution, the NV360’s Lift-Away feels straightforward but basic—it’s easy to unlatch the pod and carry it around, but the smaller size of the unit makes it feel a little less balanced when you add attachments.

The NV752’s Lift-Away design is more refined. The release mechanism is smoother, the pod is easier to grip securely, and the stronger hose suction makes the whole feature more practical. You get the impression that the NV752’s Lift-Away was designed for frequent use, while on the NV360 it feels more like a handy secondary function.

Ergonomic touches

Build quality isn’t just about the raw sturdiness of the plastic; it’s also about the little ergonomic touches that affect daily use. The NV360, being a simpler design, sticks to essentials. Its handle is plain but comfortable enough, and the vacuum swivels adequately around corners. However, there are no added touches like headlights, multiple height settings, or decorative finishes. It’s a vacuum that wears its budget roots openly.

The NV752 offers more thoughtful design extras. The LED headlights mounted on the cleaning head are surprisingly useful for spotting hidden dirt in dim corners or under furniture. The vacuum head also has height adjustment settings, allowing you to optimize suction depending on whether you’re on bare floors or thick carpet. These may sound like small details, but they make the NV752 feel like it was designed with real-world households in mind, especially those juggling multiple flooring types.

Aesthetic considerations

Appearance might not directly affect cleaning performance, but for a device that lives in your home, aesthetics can matter. The NV360 looks utilitarian, with a simple white-and-blue color scheme and clear plastic bin. Its lines are functional rather than stylish. The NV752, on the other hand, carries a glossier, more premium look, with richer color options and chrome-like accents. It’s not a design statement piece, but it feels more polished if you care about how your appliances look when not tucked away.

Durability in practice

After months or years of use, build quality reveals itself in how well the vacuum holds up. On the NV360, users often note that the lighter plastics can scuff or scratch more easily, and occasional complaints about latches or hinges loosening over time aren’t unusual. With careful use, the vacuum lasts, but it’s not built like a tank.

The NV752 tends to inspire more confidence in long-term durability. The sturdier parts resist scuffs better, and the more substantial latches and hinges maintain their secure feel longer. For households that vacuum daily or multiple times a week, that added durability matters.

Final thoughts on design and build quality

The NV360 is built around the principle of practicality and affordability: lighter weight, a smaller profile, and simpler construction that gets the job done without frills. The trade-off is a slightly less premium feel and potentially less longevity under heavy use. The NV752, in contrast, is built to handle more demanding conditions. Its sturdier construction, smoother Lift-Away design, and added ergonomic touches make it feel more robust and refined. You pay for this in weight, bulk, and cost, but the payoff is a vacuum that feels like it will stand up to heavier use and more challenging cleaning environments.

Performance

Performance is where most buyers ultimately make their decision, because a vacuum can look good, feel solid, or be easy to store, but if it doesn’t clean effectively across surfaces, it isn’t doing its main job. The Shark NV360 and NV752 are both upright vacuums designed with Shark’s Lift-Away technology, but they perform differently depending on the type of floor, the kind of mess, and whether you’re relying on the main floorhead or the hose with attachments. To get a full picture, it’s worth breaking down their capabilities into categories: suction power, airflow, pickup performance on different floor types, edge cleaning, pet hair removal, and specialized scenarios like cleaning stairs or upholstery.

Suction and airflow fundamentals

At the heart of any vacuum’s performance are suction and airflow. The NV360 delivers respectable suction for its price range, enough to handle day-to-day cleaning with confidence. Its airflow numbers are solid, particularly when used with the hose, though it isn’t the strongest in Shark’s lineup. The design of its floorhead doesn’t create a particularly tight seal against the floor, which means that while the motor generates good suction, the head doesn’t always capitalize on it fully. This is why the NV360 may sometimes require extra passes to achieve a completely clean path, especially on thicker carpets.

The NV752, on the other hand, is a noticeable step up. Its motor produces stronger suction, and its hose airflow is more powerful, which becomes immediately obvious when using attachments or cleaning with the pod detached. The floorhead, while not perfect in terms of sealing, still translates that stronger suction into better debris pickup overall. This vacuum feels more assertive when pulling debris from carpet fibers or lifting heavier particles from cracks in flooring.

Hard floor cleaning

On bare floors like hardwood, tile, or laminate, both vacuums are capable. The NV360 does a good job pulling up dust, crumbs, and everyday debris, though its slightly higher head clearance can allow very fine particles like flour or sand to escape on the first pass. With a second pass, the floor looks clean, but it lacks the precision of a tighter-sealed floorhead. The brushroll can be switched off, which is a necessity for delicate hardwoods, and it prevents scattering debris.

The NV752 handles hard floors with greater confidence. Its stronger airflow helps capture more fine dust in fewer passes, and the brushroll control paired with its height settings allows you to optimize performance for different surfaces. The LED headlights also prove surprisingly useful on hard floors, highlighting specks of dust or hair that might otherwise go unseen. While neither vacuum is perfect for fine dust on bare floors, the NV752’s suction advantage makes it the better performer.

Low-pile carpet and rugs

Carpet cleaning separates budget models from premium ones, and here the difference between the NV360 and NV752 becomes clearer. The NV360 does well on low-pile carpets, managing to lift dirt and hair without feeling too heavy to push. However, its weaker head suction means that embedded debris might not always come up on the first pass. For routine cleaning, it’s more than adequate, but it requires a little more patience for heavily soiled areas.

The NV752 shines on low-pile carpet. Its stronger suction translates into deeper cleaning, and it feels more efficient. Where the NV360 may need multiple strokes, the NV752 often achieves the same result in one or two passes. The added suction also means better pickup along seams or carpet edges, where dirt tends to collect.

High-pile carpet performance

High-pile carpets and rugs are tough for most upright vacuums. The NV360 struggles here. The head’s clearance and suction balance make it difficult to pull deeply embedded debris from thick fibers. It can clean surface-level dirt, but pushing through plush carpet takes effort, and its overall efficiency drops.

The NV752 handles high-pile carpets better, though it isn’t flawless. Its adjustable height settings allow you to raise the head slightly to prevent it from bogging down, and its stronger suction gives it more pulling power. While it may still struggle compared to premium high-end vacuums designed specifically for thick carpets, it performs better than the NV360 and is usable in households with a mix of carpet types.

Edge and corner cleaning

Both vacuums are upright models, which means their ability to clean right up against edges can be limited by the head design. The NV360 is average in this respect. It can clean close to baseboards, but small debris often remains in the corners, requiring you to use the hose and crevice tool. The NV752 performs slightly better along edges, thanks in part to its wider cleaning path and stronger suction, but it still isn’t perfect. Both models require attachments to fully handle corner dust.

Pet hair pickup

Pet hair is one of the defining challenges for vacuum performance, and here the two models diverge sharply. The NV360 can pick up pet hair from carpets effectively, and the sealed HEPA filtration helps contain allergens, but it lacks a dedicated motorized pet tool. This means that cleaning hair from upholstery, stairs, or pet bedding is more cumbersome. Long strands of hair also tend to wrap around the brushroll, requiring manual removal with scissors.

The NV752, marketed specifically as a “TruePet” model, excels in this area. Its stronger suction and airflow improve carpet pet hair pickup, but the standout feature is its motorized pet tool. This attachment makes it dramatically easier to remove hair from furniture, car seats, and stairs. Combined with the larger dustbin, it’s clearly designed for households where pets shed heavily. While it also suffers from brushroll hair wrap on the main head, the added motorized mini tool offsets that limitation significantly.

Stairs and upholstery

Both vacuums have Lift-Away capability, allowing you to detach the pod and use attachments. The NV360’s lighter body makes it easier to carry up stairs, but its suction through the hose, while fine for dusting and crevices, is less impressive for pulling embedded dirt out of upholstery. The NV752 is heavier, so it’s more effort to lug around, but once detached, its hose suction gives it a real advantage. Combined with the motorized pet tool, it performs far better on stairs, fabric furniture, and car interiors.

Handling debris types

Different vacuums perform differently depending on the type of debris. With larger particles like cereal or small pebbles, the NV360 can push them around a bit before finally collecting them. Its head design is less adept at sealing around bulky debris, which can lead to multiple passes. Fine debris like baking soda or flour can also take a bit of effort to capture completely.

The NV752 is more versatile with debris. Its stronger suction pulls up both fine particles and heavier debris more quickly, reducing the number of passes required. While large debris can still sometimes get pushed by the front of the head, it’s less of an issue compared to the NV360.

Consistency across flooring types

One aspect of performance that often goes unnoticed is consistency. The NV360 is capable but uneven: it does fine on bare floors and low carpets, struggles on thick rugs, and requires patience with fine dust or hair. The NV752 is more consistent, offering solid results across all floor types, even if it doesn’t excel in every single category. This consistency makes it the more reliable all-around performer for mixed flooring homes.

Everyday user impression

In everyday use, performance isn’t just about numbers but about how confident you feel that the vacuum is doing its job. The NV360 is reliable for basic cleaning, and many users are satisfied with its results, especially in smaller homes with less demanding messes. But when faced with challenging scenarios—lots of pet hair, thick carpet, stubborn debris—it starts to show its limitations. The NV752, in contrast, feels more powerful and versatile. When you vacuum, you can hear and see debris disappearing with less effort, and you spend less time re-cleaning the same area.

Final thoughts on performance

Both vacuums perform well enough to maintain a clean home, but their intended audiences differ. The NV360 is best suited for smaller homes, lighter messes, and households that want dependable results without expecting miracles. The NV752, with its stronger suction, pet-focused attachments, and broader versatility, is the better performer overall. It costs more and weighs more, but for households with pets, varied flooring, or heavy cleaning demands, the performance difference is significant enough to justify the upgrade.

Maintenance & Cleaning

When buying a vacuum cleaner, performance on day one is only half the story. What really determines long-term satisfaction is how easy the machine is to maintain, how often it needs attention, and how messy or frustrating the upkeep is. A vacuum that performs brilliantly but requires constant fiddling or complicated part replacements can quickly become a burden. The Shark NV360 and Shark NV752, while both upright models with Lift-Away pods, differ in their approach to maintenance and cleaning. One prioritizes simplicity, while the other adds features that make upkeep easier in some ways but more demanding in others.

Filters and filtration system

Both models use Shark’s sealed filtration systems with HEPA filters. This means air passes through multiple filters before being exhausted, trapping fine dust, allergens, and pet dander. For allergy sufferers, this is essential. The NV360 employs a pre-motor foam and felt filter along with a HEPA exhaust filter, while the NV752 uses a similar arrangement with washable filters.

Cleaning these filters is simple but essential. Foam and felt filters should be rinsed under cold water, squeezed out gently, and left to dry fully for at least 24 hours before reinsertion. Skipping the drying step risks mold growth or motor damage. HEPA filters are also washable, though they should be cleaned less frequently to avoid degradation. In practice, the NV360’s smaller dust bin means fine particles accumulate faster, so its filters may need washing more often to maintain suction. The NV752’s stronger motor pulls in more debris overall, which also leads to quicker filter loading. In either case, filter maintenance is the cornerstone of keeping performance strong.

Dust bin capacity and emptying

The NV360 has a smaller dust cup at just over one liter, while the NV752 offers a larger capacity of around one and a half liters. This difference matters in real-world use. If you have pets or a large household, the NV360 requires more frequent emptying, which can feel tedious during long cleaning sessions. The NV752 stretches out the interval between trips to the trash, which is especially convenient if you vacuum large areas in one go.

Both vacuums use a bottom-release mechanism for emptying the bin. You press a latch, and the bottom flap swings open to release debris. This design is convenient but not entirely mess-free. Fine dust often clings to the plastic walls, meaning you may need to tap the canister or even reach inside to get everything out. The NV752’s slightly larger bin reduces the frequency of this annoyance, though both models share the same drawback of static cling and dust sticking.

Hair wrap and brushroll maintenance

One of the most common frustrations with upright vacuums is hair wrap around the brushroll. Neither the NV360 nor the NV752 comes with a removable brushroll that can be snapped out for easy cleaning. Instead, hair must be cut away manually using scissors or a seam ripper. This is time-consuming and can feel tedious if you share your home with long-haired family members or pets that shed heavily.

The NV752 does soften the blow by including a motorized mini pet tool. This tool tends to handle pet hair better on upholstery, reducing the amount of hair that makes it to the main brushroll. Still, both models require regular attention to prevent tangles from building up and affecting performance. If you vacuum often, expect to clean the brushroll every week or two.

Lift-Away pod cleaning

Because both vacuums feature Lift-Away functionality, you’ll sometimes use them in handheld mode for stairs, upholstery, or cars. This mode relies heavily on the hose and attachments, which need occasional cleaning themselves. Over time, debris can build up inside the hose, reducing suction and sometimes causing unpleasant odors. Regular inspection and the occasional rinse or wipe-out keep things running smoothly. The NV752’s stronger suction makes clogs less common, but when they do occur, the wider range of attachments means you’ll need to keep an eye on more parts.

Attachments and upkeep

Attachments are another area where maintenance comes into play. The NV360 comes with a basic set—crevice tool and upholstery tool—which are simple to clean. A quick wipe or rinse usually suffices. The NV752, with its larger toolkit including the motorized pet brush, requires more upkeep. The mini motorized tool can accumulate hair in its own smaller brushroll, and since it’s a powered attachment, you need to clear it more carefully to avoid stressing the motor. The upholstery and crevice tools, however, remain easy to clean and maintain.

Odor control

All bagless vacuums have the potential for odors if not maintained properly. Dust, hair, and especially pet debris can cause a stale smell over time. The NV360, with its smaller dustbin, tends to need more frequent emptying and filter cleaning to avoid this issue. The NV752’s larger bin reduces odor buildup slightly by keeping airflow moving, but it also pulls in more pet hair and dander, which can worsen smells if neglected. Regular filter washing and occasional bin rinsing with mild soap are the best strategies for both.

Longevity of parts

Maintenance also includes considering how long parts last before they need replacement. Foam and felt filters on both models should be replaced every six to twelve months depending on use, while HEPA filters can last longer with proper care. Dust bins and latches typically last for years, but the thinner plastic on the NV360 makes it more prone to scuffs or minor wear over time. The NV752’s sturdier build offers better durability, though the complexity of its attachments means more components that could eventually require replacement.

Ease of access

A key part of maintenance is how easy it is to reach the parts you need to clean. Both models are fairly user-friendly. Filters are accessible without tools, and the dust bin detaches with a button press. The brushroll is more awkward, requiring manual cutting of tangled hair, but this is common to many uprights in their price range. The NV752’s larger frame means you sometimes need to maneuver a bit more to access certain parts, but its sturdier latches make reassembly reassuringly simple.

Frequency of upkeep

In day-to-day terms, expect the NV360 to demand slightly more frequent maintenance. The smaller bin and lighter build mean more trips to empty and more frequent filter checks. The NV752, though sturdier and larger, requires more effort when cleaning attachments and dealing with hair wrap, but its longer emptying intervals help offset that. Households with pets will find the NV752 requires less frequent “deep” maintenance thanks to its pet tool, but both machines need consistent attention to stay at peak performance.

Overall user experience with maintenance

For someone who values simplicity, the NV360 is straightforward to maintain. The fewer attachments mean fewer moving parts, and the entire process—empty bin, rinse filters, cut hair from brushroll—can be done in just a few minutes. The NV752 is a little more involved. It offers greater performance and features, but with that comes the responsibility of keeping more parts clean and ensuring the powered attachments remain free of tangles.

Final thoughts on maintenance and cleaning

Both the NV360 and NV752 share Shark’s philosophy of user-friendly, bagless design with washable filters. The NV360 keeps things lean, with a smaller bin and simpler attachment set that make upkeep relatively quick but more frequent. The NV752, with its larger capacity, stronger suction, and pet-focused tools, stretches the intervals between emptying and boosts usability but introduces more complexity in maintaining attachments and managing hair wrap. Choosing between them comes down to what kind of maintenance burden you prefer: more frequent but simpler upkeep with the NV360, or less frequent but more involved upkeep with the NV752.

Energy Efficiency & Noise Levels

When comparing two upright vacuums like the Shark NV360 and Shark NV752, energy efficiency and noise levels play a surprisingly important role in daily use. While suction power and cleaning performance are obvious priorities, the amount of electricity a vacuum consumes and how much noise it makes directly impact both running costs and comfort. Vacuums are appliances that many households use multiple times a week, sometimes daily, so efficiency and noise output add up over time. Here’s how these two models stack up in these areas.

Motor power and energy draw

The NV360 is built with affordability and simplicity in mind, and this is reflected in its motor. It draws less power compared to the NV752, operating at a level that balances suction with moderate energy consumption. While it doesn’t deliver the raw suction power of its more expensive sibling, it also doesn’t demand as much electricity. For smaller homes or lighter cleaning jobs, this lower power consumption is an advantage because it reduces long-term energy costs.

The NV752, meanwhile, comes equipped with a more powerful motor. This allows it to generate stronger suction and airflow, but it also increases energy draw. While not dramatically inefficient compared to other uprights in its class, it does consume more electricity than the NV360 during operation. For households where the vacuum sees frequent, long sessions—such as homes with pets or larger spaces—the energy use will be higher. That said, because the NV752 can complete jobs in fewer passes thanks to its stronger suction, some of that efficiency is regained through reduced run time.

Efficiency in practical use

Energy efficiency is more than just the motor’s wattage. It’s also about how effectively the vacuum converts that energy into cleaning power. The NV360’s moderate suction sometimes requires more passes over carpet to fully pick up embedded dirt, especially on thicker pile. That means a user may spend more time cleaning the same area, offsetting the advantage of its lower power draw.

The NV752’s stronger suction, by contrast, ensures that dirt and debris are often picked up on the first or second pass. While the motor consumes more energy per minute, the shorter cleaning time can make its overall energy efficiency competitive in real-world use. For large households, the NV752 may actually use less electricity per cleaning session simply because it finishes the job faster.

Noise levels during operation

Noise is one of the most noticeable factors in everyday vacuuming. Both models are far from silent, but they differ in tone and volume. The NV360 produces a consistent, mid-range hum typical of budget uprights. It isn’t piercingly loud, but it’s far from quiet, and in small homes or apartments, it can feel intrusive. Conversations, phone calls, or watching TV nearby are difficult while it’s running.

The NV752, with its larger motor, naturally produces more sound. Its noise level is slightly higher than the NV360, but the tone is deeper and less shrill. This makes it less grating over time. Additionally, the NV752’s sealed system seems to reduce high-pitched whistle sounds that can sometimes accompany older or less robust vacuums. While neither vacuum could be described as quiet, the NV752 manages its noise in a way that feels less fatiguing to the ears during extended use.

Noise perception in different cleaning modes

Lift-Away mode affects noise as well. With the NV360, detaching the pod and using attachments tends to make the noise feel sharper because the sound is closer to ear level. The NV752, though louder overall, disperses sound more evenly even in Lift-Away mode, making it easier to tolerate during stair or upholstery cleaning. Attachments with smaller nozzles can amplify the noise on both models, but this is common across all uprights.

Impact of flooring type on noise

The surface being cleaned also changes the noise profile. On bare floors, both vacuums are slightly quieter since the brushroll isn’t working as hard and debris doesn’t rattle against the head. On carpets, the sound deepens as suction increases, especially with the NV752. Larger debris such as cereal or pebbles can create clattering noises as they travel up the hose in both vacuums, with the NV752 amplifying the effect due to its stronger suction.

Household considerations

Noise and efficiency directly influence how convenient a vacuum is in real households. For families with children, pets, or shared living spaces, a quieter vacuum can mean the difference between cleaning comfortably or disturbing everyone. The NV360’s moderate volume makes it tolerable for quick cleaning jobs, but its higher-pitched tone can be bothersome if you’re vacuuming for longer stretches. The NV752, while louder overall, produces a lower-frequency noise that many find easier to ignore.

In terms of efficiency, households with larger areas to clean benefit from the NV752’s ability to finish the job faster. Smaller apartments or lighter cleaning routines lean in favor of the NV360, which avoids overconsumption of power while still handling day-to-day debris.

Long-term cost implications

Electricity use isn’t massive for either vacuum, but it can add up over years of use. The NV360 is inherently more efficient for short, frequent cleanings thanks to its lighter motor. The NV752, however, balances higher energy draw with efficiency of use. Since it covers more ground in less time and requires fewer passes, its actual operating costs may not be significantly higher in the long run, especially in households where it replaces the need for repeated deep cleaning sessions.

Final thoughts on efficiency and noise

In terms of energy efficiency, the NV360 is the leaner machine, but its need for extra passes can erode the advantage slightly. The NV752 consumes more power but delivers stronger, faster cleaning, which often evens the score. As for noise, the NV360 is slightly quieter on paper, but its sharper tone makes it less pleasant for long use. The NV752’s deeper, steadier hum is more powerful but more tolerable, particularly for extended cleaning.

For users who prioritize minimal energy draw and only need a vacuum for smaller homes or lighter messes, the NV360 feels like the more efficient choice. For those with larger homes, pets, or frequent messes, the NV752’s balance of higher power and faster results makes it an equally efficient—if louder—investment.

Ergonomics & Usability

A vacuum cleaner can have all the suction power and advanced features in the world, but if it’s uncomfortable to push, awkward to carry, or complicated to use, it quickly becomes a frustration instead of a help. Ergonomics and usability are often overlooked in vacuum reviews, yet they define the day-to-day experience of living with a machine. With the Shark NV360 and Shark NV752, we’re looking at two upright models that share the same Lift-Away DNA but diverge in how user-friendly they feel in practice. One is lighter and simpler, while the other leans into features and premium touches that make longer cleaning sessions more tolerable. Let’s break down how each performs in terms of comfort, design practicality, and overall usability.

Weight and maneuverability

The NV360 is the lighter of the two, weighing around 12.5 pounds without attachments. This makes it easier to carry up stairs, lift into closets, and maneuver around furniture. For users with smaller frames or mobility limitations, the reduced weight is a clear advantage. On the downside, its lighter frame means it doesn’t always “glide” across thick carpet as smoothly as the heavier NV752, sometimes requiring a little more arm effort to keep it steady on deep pile.

The NV752 is noticeably heavier, coming in at about 15.5 pounds. The added weight is partially due to its sturdier build and additional features. While that weight helps it feel more grounded and stable on carpets, it can be cumbersome to lug upstairs or use in handheld mode for long periods. However, Shark designed the NV752 with swivel steering that’s more refined than the NV360’s. The difference is clear when navigating around tight corners or under furniture—the NV752 feels smoother and more agile despite being bulkier overall.

Handle and grip comfort

Both vacuums feature handles with molded grips designed to fit naturally in the hand. The NV360 keeps it simple, with a functional, slightly curved handle that feels solid but not particularly cushioned. It works fine for quick cleanups, but during longer sessions, users may notice the harder plastic isn’t as forgiving.

The NV752 improves on this with a more ergonomic handle shape and softer contours that reduce strain on the wrist. The controls are integrated into the handle as well, allowing you to switch modes without bending down. This small but important touch makes a difference in usability, especially for those who switch between bare floors and carpets frequently.

Lift-Away functionality

Both models feature Shark’s signature Lift-Away design, which lets you detach the canister from the main upright frame and carry it around for above-floor cleaning. This is one of Shark’s defining features and a major ergonomic advantage.

On the NV360, the Lift-Away pod is lighter, making it easy to carry while cleaning stairs or reaching higher surfaces like shelves or curtains. However, the smaller size of the NV360 means the hose feels shorter and less flexible, limiting your reach in handheld mode. You sometimes find yourself tugging at the base unit or repositioning it more often than you’d like.

The NV752’s Lift-Away pod is heavier but comes with a longer, more flexible hose that makes it more practical for stairs and upholstery. Because the unit itself is sturdier, it feels less like you’re wrestling with it when stretching the hose to its limits. The weight trade-off is real—you won’t want to carry it for extended periods—but the extra reach gives it better overall usability in Lift-Away mode.

Control placement and accessibility

Controls on the NV360 are basic and located on the main body. To switch between carpet and bare floor modes, you’ll need to bend slightly, which isn’t a deal-breaker but can get annoying if you’re toggling frequently during a session.

The NV752 streamlines this with fingertip controls right on the handle. Switching modes is instant and doesn’t interrupt your cleaning rhythm. If you often transition between rugs, hardwood, and carpets, this setup feels significantly more user-friendly. It’s a premium touch that adds real value for households with mixed flooring.

Cord length and reach

Cord length is a surprisingly important usability factor. The NV360 comes with a cord around 25 feet, which is adequate for apartments or smaller rooms but often requires you to switch outlets when cleaning larger areas. For some users, this stop-and-go routine becomes a minor frustration.

The NV752, by contrast, includes a longer cord at approximately 30 feet. That extra five feet doesn’t sound like much, but in practice it often means the difference between finishing a room in one go or stopping to relocate the plug. Combined with its longer hose, the NV752 offers better overall reach, reducing interruptions during cleaning.

Storage considerations

The NV360’s compact design makes it easier to store in closets or small spaces. Its lighter frame and slimmer profile allow it to tuck neatly into narrower gaps. For apartment dwellers or anyone with limited storage, this can be a deciding factor.

The NV752, being bulkier, demands more room. Its larger body and wider head mean it takes up more floor space, and its extra attachments need storage space as well. Some buyers find this a drawback, especially in smaller homes. However, those who prioritize performance and features may be willing to sacrifice the extra storage room.

Ease of assembly and setup

Both models are straightforward to assemble out of the box. The NV360 comes together in just a few clicks, with minimal parts to attach. It’s the kind of appliance you can have ready in under ten minutes.

The NV752, while slightly more involved, is still intuitive. The extra attachments and accessories mean a bit more unboxing, but the parts lock securely into place, and the instructions are clear. Neither vacuum is intimidating to set up, though the NV360’s simplicity gives it an edge for users who want minimal fuss.

LED headlights and visibility

One usability perk that sets the NV752 apart is its built-in LED headlights. These are located on the nozzle and illuminate dust, hair, and crumbs that are otherwise invisible, especially on darker floors or under furniture. It might seem like a gimmick, but once you use them, it’s hard to go back. The NV360 lacks this feature, which makes cleaning under low-light conditions more hit-or-miss.

Learning curve and everyday practicality

The NV360 is about as simple as it gets. Plug it in, turn it on, and you’re ready to clean. Its lack of advanced features keeps the learning curve nonexistent, which is appealing for users who just want a no-nonsense vacuum.

The NV752, on the other hand, offers more features and therefore a slightly steeper learning curve. Switching modes, using powered attachments, and managing its larger size all require some adjustment. However, the added usability enhancements—like fingertip controls, headlights, and extended reach—make the experience more enjoyable once you’re familiar with them.

Fatigue during long sessions

For shorter cleaning jobs, both vacuums feel fine. But during longer sessions, their ergonomic differences become more apparent. The NV360’s lighter weight makes it less tiring to push around, but the absence of cushioned grips and the need to bend down for controls can add strain over time. The NV752 is heavier, but its better handle design, fingertip controls, and smoother steering reduce fatigue in different ways. The weight becomes a disadvantage primarily when carrying the vacuum, not when pushing it on the floor.

Final thoughts on ergonomics and usability

The NV360 wins on simplicity, portability, and ease of storage. It’s ideal for those who want a straightforward vacuum that won’t wear them out or take up too much space. The NV752, though heavier and bulkier, excels in comfort features and overall usability during cleaning. Its refined steering, longer reach, fingertip controls, and LED headlights all contribute to a smoother, more enjoyable user experience.

In short: the NV360 is the ergonomic pick for lighter, smaller homes, while the NV752 shines in usability for those who demand more convenience, power, and polish from their vacuum.

Pet-Friendliness

For many households, pets aren’t just companions—they’re full members of the family. But with furry friends come endless trails of hair, dander, and the occasional accident or tracked-in mess. Choosing a vacuum cleaner that can handle this lifestyle is critical. The Shark NV360 and Shark NV752 both promise strong cleaning abilities, but their pet-friendliness differs in meaningful ways. From hair pickup on different surfaces to dealing with odors and specialized attachments, here’s how each model performs in real-world pet households.

Hair pickup on carpets

Pet hair embeds itself deeply into carpet fibers, often resisting weaker vacuums. The NV360 does a respectable job on low- and medium-pile carpets. Its brushroll agitates fibers effectively, pulling up loose hair and surface-level debris. However, when dealing with thick, plush carpets or large volumes of shedding (think multiple cats or a double-coated dog), it sometimes requires several passes to achieve a thorough clean. Hair can also wrap around the brushroll more quickly, meaning you’ll need to pause occasionally for maintenance.

The NV752, with its stronger suction and upgraded brushroll design, performs much better in these situations. It can pull embedded hair from deep within carpet fibers, often in a single pass. Even on high-pile rugs where the NV360 struggles, the NV752 manages to lift stubborn hair without as much effort. While it isn’t immune to hair wrapping around the brushroll, the stronger airflow keeps the roller clearer for longer, which reduces interruptions. For pet-heavy homes with lots of carpeting, the NV752 clearly has the edge.

Performance on hard floors

Pet hair on hardwood, tile, or laminate can be just as frustrating—it tends to scatter and float rather than sit neatly waiting to be vacuumed. The NV360 sometimes pushes lighter hair and fur clumps around before suction captures them. Its brushroll isn’t optimized for bare floors, and while it does eventually pick up the debris, it requires a bit more maneuvering.

The NV752, on the other hand, has a bare-floor mode that shuts off the brushroll while maintaining strong suction. This prevents scattering and allows hair to be pulled directly into the nozzle. Combined with the LED headlights, which illuminate fine strands that might otherwise go unnoticed, the NV752 makes quick work of pet hair on smooth surfaces. For mixed flooring households, this flexibility is a big usability improvement.

Upholstery and furniture cleaning

Couches, chairs, and pet beds are some of the hardest places to remove hair. The NV360 comes with a standard upholstery tool, which does an okay job at removing surface fur but struggles with stubbornly embedded hair. You often need to make multiple passes or resort to lint rollers afterward for a fully clean result.

The NV752 includes a TruePet motorized brush, a powered handheld tool designed specifically for upholstery, stairs, and small areas. This accessory makes a huge difference. The motorized action lifts embedded hair far more effectively than the NV360’s non-powered tool. Pet beds, car seats, and fabric chairs all benefit from the extra agitation and suction. For pet owners who battle constant furniture fur, the NV752 offers a more complete solution.

Handling odors and dander

Pet ownership doesn’t just mean hair; it also brings dander and odors. Both vacuums are equipped with HEPA filtration and sealed systems, which are crucial for trapping allergens rather than expelling them back into the room. The NV360 performs well in this regard, keeping fine dander out of the air and leaving the space fresher after vacuuming.

The NV752, however, ups the game with its Advanced Anti-Allergen Complete Seal Technology paired with HEPA filters. In practice, this means it captures more microscopic particles and holds them securely within the vacuum. For households with allergy sufferers, this is particularly valuable. It minimizes sneezing and helps control the invisible side effects of pet ownership that standard vacuums might miss.

Ease of cleaning up messes

Pets can be unpredictable. Muddy paw prints, spilled kibble, or litter box scatter are all common challenges. The NV360 handles larger debris reasonably well, though its narrower suction path sometimes leaves bits behind that need a second pass.

The NV752’s stronger suction and wider cleaning head make it faster and more efficient for these types of messes. The LED headlights also help identify crumbs or litter granules on darker flooring, which ensures nothing gets missed. While neither vacuum is designed for wet messes, both handle dry pet-related accidents effectively, with the NV752 again coming out on top.

Brushroll maintenance with pet hair

Pet hair is notorious for tangling around vacuum rollers. The NV360, with its simpler brushroll, tends to accumulate tangles more quickly. This means you’ll need to stop and cut away hair more frequently, especially if you own long-haired pets. It’s not difficult, but it does add time and hassle to the cleaning routine.

The NV752 still requires maintenance, but its stronger airflow and more refined roller design reduce the frequency of tangles. You’ll still need to occasionally clear hair, but it doesn’t choke up as quickly as the NV360. For households with multiple shedding pets, this makes a noticeable difference in overall convenience.

Noise considerations for pets

Vacuum noise doesn’t just affect humans—pets are often terrified of loud appliances. The NV360, while not excessively loud, has a higher-pitched tone that can be startling for animals. Many cats and small dogs may scatter at the sound.

The NV752, though slightly louder in volume, produces a deeper, less shrill hum. Pets may still retreat to another room, but the sound is less likely to cause panic compared to the NV360’s sharper tone. For animals sensitive to high-frequency sounds, the NV752 might be the slightly friendlier option.

Suitability for multi-pet households

If you have one cat or a small dog, the NV360 may handle your cleaning needs adequately with regular use. Its lighter build and simpler design work well for modest pet-related messes, and the lower price point makes it appealing for budget-conscious households.

For multi-pet homes or those with larger, heavy-shedding breeds, the NV752 is far more suitable. Its superior suction, TruePet tool, advanced filtration, and stronger performance across surfaces make it much better equipped to deal with the sheer volume of fur and dander. While it comes at a higher cost, the investment pays off in reduced cleaning time and improved results.

Long-term usability in pet homes

Over time, vacuums used in pet households face more wear and tear. Pet hair, dander, and debris can clog filters and wear down brushrolls. The NV360 requires more frequent filter cleaning and roller maintenance to keep it performing well. If neglected, its suction can drop noticeably.

The NV752, with its more powerful system and advanced filters, handles prolonged exposure to pet messes better. It still requires maintenance, but its components seem more durable and less prone to quick performance degradation. For owners planning to stick with a single vacuum for years, this durability makes the NV752 a stronger choice.

Final thoughts on pet-friendliness

Both the Shark NV360 and NV752 are capable of handling pet hair, but they sit on different levels of the spectrum. The NV360 is a good option for light pet households, offering solid performance at an accessible price. However, it requires more frequent maintenance and lacks specialized tools that make pet cleanup easier.

The NV752 is built with pets in mind. Its stronger suction, motorized TruePet tool, advanced filtration, and refined design features give it the upper hand in almost every pet-related category. While heavier and more expensive, it makes cleaning up after furry companions far less of a battle.

In short, the NV360 is pet-friendly enough for casual pet owners, while the NV752 is the go-to choice for serious pet households.

Durability & Long-Term Ownership

When investing in a vacuum cleaner, buyers aren’t just concerned with how it performs out of the box—they want to know how it will hold up after months and years of regular use. Upright vacuums, especially those used in busy households or pet-heavy environments, take on a lot of wear and tear. Between daily debris, hair wrapping around brushrolls, frequent filter cleaning, and the occasional accidental bump into furniture, durability becomes just as important as suction power. The Shark NV360 and Shark NV752 each have reputations for reliability, but their long-term ownership experiences differ in subtle ways. Let’s take a closer look at build durability, component lifespan, warranty support, and how each model fares as a long-term cleaning partner.

Build materials and structural integrity

The NV360 is designed as a budget-friendly model, which means its build uses lighter plastics and a simpler frame. This gives it the advantage of portability but also makes it feel less rugged than premium alternatives. The plastic housing is prone to scuffs and scratches, particularly on the body and dustbin. While these cosmetic issues don’t affect performance, they may give the vacuum a more “used” look relatively quickly. That said, the NV360’s basic design is fairly resilient—fewer moving parts and fewer bells and whistles mean less to potentially break over time.

The NV752, by contrast, feels sturdier from the outset. Its thicker plastic casing, reinforced seams, and heavier components give it a more premium and durable feel. Even after extended use, it tends to hold its structural integrity better than the NV360. The added weight, while making it less portable, contributes to the impression that it’s built to last. Its body resists cracks and warping better, especially if it’s used frequently on heavy carpets where force and pressure are greater.

Dustbin and filter system durability

Both models are bagless, relying on a dustbin and filters to collect and manage debris. The NV360’s dustbin is smaller, meaning it fills quickly, especially in pet homes. Frequent emptying can stress the latch and hinge over time. While the components are easy to replace, long-term use may cause the latch to feel looser or less secure. Its filters are foam and felt, which require regular washing and replacement every year or so. If maintained, they hold up reasonably well, but neglect can lead to clogs that shorten the vacuum’s lifespan.

The NV752’s dustbin is larger and better constructed. The release mechanism feels firmer, and the plastic walls are more resistant to scratches and clouding from debris. The filters are also designed to last longer and are part of the machine’s advanced sealed system. With regular cleaning, the NV752 maintains airflow and suction strength more consistently over the years. Its filter housing feels more robust and less prone to wear than the NV360’s simpler design.

Brushroll longevity

Brushroll wear is a common long-term issue, especially in households with pets or thick carpets. The NV360 uses a standard bristle brushroll that works effectively but accumulates hair quickly. Over time, constant tangling and detangling can weaken the bristles and stress the roller bearings. Users often find they need to replace the roller sooner than expected if they vacuum multiple times per week in high-shedding homes.

The NV752’s brushroll is more advanced and better suited for long-term durability. Its design allows for stronger agitation without as much hair wrapping, though some tangling is still inevitable. Because of its sturdier bearings and more durable bristles, it tends to last longer before replacement is needed. Replacement rollers are readily available for both models, but the NV752’s brushroll holds up better in demanding conditions.

Hose and attachment wear

Hoses and attachments are often weak points in vacuum longevity. The NV360’s hose is shorter and thinner, which makes it more prone to stretching out or developing cracks over time if handled roughly. Attachments like the upholstery tool and crevice tool are functional but lightweight, and they can show wear with repeated use.

The NV752, by comparison, has a more robust hose that feels thicker and more flexible. It resists kinks better and maintains suction strength even after years of bending and stretching. Its attachments, particularly the motorized TruePet tool, are sturdier and designed for heavy-duty use. Because these tools are built to handle embedded hair and debris, they maintain effectiveness longer than the NV360’s simpler accessories.

Maintenance impact on durability

How well each vacuum ages largely depends on how well it’s maintained. The NV360 demands more frequent upkeep—emptying the bin, washing filters, clearing hair from the brushroll—because it doesn’t handle buildup as gracefully as the NV752. If a user neglects these tasks, the NV360’s performance can degrade quickly, and suction loss or motor strain may occur earlier in its lifespan.

The NV752, while not maintenance-free, is more forgiving. Its larger dustbin, more durable filters, and stronger motor allow it to tolerate higher volumes of debris before showing strain. Owners who clean filters monthly and keep the brushroll clear can expect the NV752 to retain near-original performance for years without major issues.

Motor longevity

The motor is the heart of any vacuum, and both models deliver reliable performance. The NV360’s motor, while capable, is smaller and less powerful, meaning it can be more stressed in demanding situations like deep carpet cleaning or heavy pet hair pickup. Over the long term, this may contribute to slightly shorter motor life compared to the NV752.

The NV752 houses a stronger motor built for heavier loads. Its higher suction power doesn’t just mean better performance today—it also means less strain when handling tough messes, which translates into greater longevity. While both motors can last many years with proper care, the NV752 has a durability advantage simply because it operates under less stress in challenging conditions.

Warranty and replacement parts

Both vacuums typically come with a limited warranty, but the NV752’s is often longer, reflecting its position as a premium model. In practice, Shark provides solid customer support and makes replacement parts for both models readily available, from filters and rollers to hoses and attachments. The affordability of replacement parts for the NV360 is a plus, but the NV752’s stronger warranty gives peace of mind to those investing more upfront.

Cosmetic aging and perception of durability

Cosmetic durability matters, too, as it affects how “new” a vacuum feels over time. The NV360’s plastic body shows scratches, scuffs, and cloudiness in the dustbin sooner. While this doesn’t impact functionality, it contributes to the impression of faster aging.

The NV752’s thicker plastics, reinforced seams, and more polished finish resist wear better. Even after years, it tends to look less beaten up, which is a small but meaningful part of long-term ownership satisfaction.

Cost vs. lifespan value

The NV360 is less expensive upfront, which makes it appealing for budget buyers. However, its lighter build and more frequent maintenance demands may mean a shorter effective lifespan in demanding environments. It’s a solid choice for smaller households, lighter cleaning duties, or as a secondary vacuum.

The NV752, though more expensive, offers better long-term value. Its stronger construction, more durable components, and higher tolerance for heavy use make it more likely to remain a reliable cleaning partner for many years. For buyers willing to invest more initially, the NV752 pays off in reduced frustrations and fewer replacements.

Final thoughts on durability and ownership

The Shark NV360 and NV752 both deliver durability within their respective categories, but they cater to different ownership expectations. The NV360 is built to be reliable and functional at a budget price, though it requires attentive care to keep it running at peak performance. The NV752 is sturdier, more powerful, and designed with long-term resilience in mind, making it better suited for households with high cleaning demands or multiple pets.

If you want a vacuum that will last many years with heavy use, the NV752 is the safer bet. If you want a cost-effective model that gets the job done in smaller spaces and don’t mind performing regular upkeep, the NV360 remains a dependable choice.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Shark NV360 and Shark NV752 ultimately comes down to balancing budget, household needs, and long-term expectations. Both vacuums share Shark’s hallmark Lift-Away design, bagless convenience, and sealed filtration systems, making them capable performers across a variety of cleaning tasks. Yet, when you take a closer look, their differences highlight two distinct buyer profiles.

The NV360 is the practical choice for smaller homes, lighter cleaning demands, or buyers who simply want strong everyday suction without a steep price tag. It’s lightweight, easy to maneuver, and offers reliable cleaning on carpets and bare floors. However, it does require more frequent maintenance, and its simpler brushroll and attachments mean it isn’t the best fit for heavy pet households or those with deep, plush carpeting. For the budget-conscious or those with modest needs, it provides solid value.

The NV752, on the other hand, is clearly designed for power users. With stronger suction, a sturdier build, a larger dustbin, and pet-specific tools like the motorized TruePet brush, it handles demanding environments with ease. Multi-pet homes, allergy sufferers, and those with large carpeted areas will appreciate its superior performance and durability. While heavier and more expensive, it delivers greater long-term value by requiring less effort, fewer passes, and fewer compromises.

In short, the NV360 is a dependable workhorse for straightforward cleaning, while the NV752 is a premium partner for households that need a deeper, more comprehensive clean. Both will get the job done, but the right choice depends on whether you’re looking for affordability and simplicity—or robust power and versatility built to last.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top