If you’ve been shopping for a no‑nonsense upright that just cleans—without app drama, without batteries to babysit—the Shark Navigator line keeps popping up. Two models dominate the budget‑friendly conversation: the Shark NV360 Navigator Lift‑Away Deluxe and the Shark NV352 Navigator Lift‑Away. I spent time using both across carpet, rugs, hardwood, and a lot of fur (two dogs, one long‑haired offender). Below is the full story—how they’re built, how they clean, what they’re like to live with, where each one shines, and where they fall short.
Shark NV360 vs Shark NV352 Comparison Chart
If you click the links below, under the product images, you will be redirected to Amazon.com. In case you then decide to buy anything, Amazon.com will pay me a commission. This doesn’t affect the honesty of this review in any way though.
| Feature | Shark NV360 | Shark NV352 |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
| Check the best price on Amazon | Check the best price on Amazon | |
| Vacuum Type | Upright with Lift-Away | Upright with Lift-Away |
| Weight | ~12.5 lbs | ~12 lbs |
| Dimensions | 14.37” x 11.61” x 26.77” | 15” x 11.4” x 45.5” |
| Dust Cup Capacity | 1.2 quarts | 1.1 quarts |
| Filtration System | HEPA filter + Anti-Allergen Complete Seal | HEPA filter + Anti-Allergen Complete Seal |
| Power (Amps) | 10 amps | 10 amps |
| Wattage | ~1200W | ~1200W |
| Cord Length | 25 ft | 25 ft |
| Hose Length | ~5.5 ft | ~5 ft |
| Brushroll | Motorized brushroll (not self-cleaning) | Motorized brushroll (not self-cleaning) |
| Hard Floor Mode | Yes (brushroll shut-off) | Yes (brushroll shut-off) |
| Lift-Away Function | Yes (detachable canister) | Yes (detachable canister) |
| Accessories | Upholstery tool, crevice tool, dusting brush (varies by package) | Upholstery tool, crevice tool, dusting brush (varies by package) |
| Noise Level | ~72–75 dB (deeper hum) | ~72–75 dB (slightly higher pitch) |
| Best For | Larger homes, multi-pet households, deeper cleaning sessions | Smaller homes, lighter cleaning, easier portability |
| My individual reviews | Shark NV360 review | Shark NV352 review |
Design & Build Quality
When you set the Shark NV360 and the Shark NV352 side by side, you quickly realize they’re cut from the same cloth. Both belong to Shark’s long-running Navigator line, and they share the utilitarian, upright silhouette that’s become instantly recognizable: tall, slim, slightly top-heavy, and unmistakably “Shark.” But once you spend some time handling them—picking them up, clicking the parts together, rolling them across different surfaces—the differences in design and build quality reveal themselves. This section takes a long, hard look at the physical construction, fit and finish, weight, balance, and durability of these two vacuums, as well as how those choices affect day-to-day usability.
First Impressions
Both machines arrive in relatively compact boxes, partially assembled. The unboxing experience is straightforward: floor nozzle, wand, pod, handle, and hose all click together with minimal fuss. Shark’s modular design is consistent across its upright lineup, so if you’ve owned another Navigator or Rotator, the setup will feel familiar. The main impression both models give is that they’re built to be workhorses rather than style icons. They’re not flashy. They’re functional—more “appliance in the closet” than “statement piece in the living room.” That said, they have a clean, practical aesthetic with smooth curves and glossy plastics that don’t look out of place even if stored in plain sight.
Materials and Plastics
The NV352 and NV360 both use a similar mix of ABS and polypropylene plastics, which is typical for upright vacuums in this price tier. These plastics are light but tough, capable of withstanding the daily bumps against furniture legs or being tugged up stairs. The finish is slightly different: the NV360 has a bit more heft and rigidity to its plastic shells, particularly noticeable in the pod and dust cup housing. The NV352 feels lighter, which is great for portability but can sometimes translate into a slightly more flexible feel when you twist the wand or lock the pod onto the base. Neither machine feels cheap, but the NV360 does come across as the sturdier of the two.
Assembly and Fit
Assembly tolerances matter more than you might think. A vacuum with sloppy locks and connections can rattle, creak, or even disconnect in the middle of use. The NV352 locks together securely, but if you deliberately torque the wand or put sideways stress on the pod-to-nozzle connection, you can detect a small amount of flex. The NV360, in contrast, feels a bit more confident in those junctions. The locks engage with a more decisive “click,” and the pieces fit with less play. Over long-term ownership, these small differences can add up: a tighter fit tends to resist wear better and makes the machine feel solid even after years of use.
Size and Footprint
Both vacuums have roughly the same upright height and footprint, which means they occupy about the same amount of storage space in a closet or laundry room. The nozzle width is just under ten inches, wide enough to cover a reasonable swath of carpet with each pass but narrow enough to sneak between chair legs. If you’re used to full-size uprights with wide cleaning heads, both models may feel a touch compact, but that compactness is also what makes them so maneuverable in tight quarters.
Weight and Handling
Here’s where the first big design difference appears. The NV352 is significantly lighter, at around twelve and a half pounds. Pick it up by the handle and it feels manageable, almost dainty compared to bulkier uprights. Carrying it up a flight of stairs is not much more demanding than carrying a gallon of water. The NV360, on the other hand, tips the scales closer to sixteen pounds. That four-pound difference may not sound like much on paper, but in practice it changes the feel. The NV360 feels more planted, heavier in the hand, and a little more deliberate in movement. When you’re rolling it across carpet, that extra weight can actually be an asset—it grips the floor, stays aligned, and doesn’t tip or wobble as easily. But if you’re the kind of user who frequently carts the vacuum from one floor to another, the added heft can become tiresome over time.
Stability and Balance
Both machines have their weight distribution toward the top, a hallmark of Shark’s Lift-Away design. The pod, motor, and dust cup are stacked above the nozzle, so if you whip the machine into a sharp turn, you can feel the top wanting to lean outward. This top-heavy stance is not unique to Shark—it’s common among modular uprights—but it does influence how the vacuum steers. The NV352, being lighter, can feel a little “tippy” if you yank it too hard, but it also responds quickly to small wrist movements. The NV360 counters with more mass over the base, which steadies the vacuum during fast pivots and makes it feel less flighty. It’s a tradeoff between agility and stability, and which you prefer depends on your cleaning style.
Cord and Hose Placement
Cord placement can affect handling more than you’d think. Both models have the power cord exiting from the upper part of the vacuum body and wrapping around storage hooks along the side. The cord length is a generous twenty-five feet, giving enough range to cover medium-sized rooms without switching outlets. The NV360’s heavier build makes it a little less prone to getting tugged off balance when you stretch the cord to its limit, while the NV352, being lighter, will sometimes shift or tilt if the cord catches sharply on a corner. Hose routing is neat and intuitive on both: it loops around the back of the machine, clips securely, and detaches quickly for wand use.
Dust Cup Design
Both vacuums use a transparent, bagless dust cup mounted at the front of the pod. This placement keeps the profile narrow while still giving the user a clear view of how much debris has been collected. The NV352’s dust cup is slightly larger in usable capacity, but the NV360’s cup feels more robust in construction. The latch mechanisms are simple on both—push a button and the bottom flap drops open for easy emptying—but the NV360’s mechanism feels more solid, with less play in the hinge. The transparency of both cups is practical, letting you spot clogs or track how quickly pet hair is filling the bin, but it does mean they’ll start to look dusty and scratched over time.
Floor Nozzle and Brushroll Housing
The nozzle housing is a crucial part of an upright’s build quality—it takes the brunt of daily collisions with chair legs, table corners, and baseboards. Both models use similar housing designs: relatively low-slung, flat enough to slide under low furniture edges, and reinforced at the corners. The NV360’s base feels heavier and a bit more anchored, while the NV352’s is lighter and can be nudged around more easily. Both house a single brushroll with stiff bristles for carpet agitation and a toggle that lets you shut the brush off for bare floors. Neither includes modern upgrades like LED headlights or anti-hair-wrap technology, so they’re relying on raw sturdiness rather than features to carry them.
Controls and Switchgear
Controls are simple and identical on both vacuums: a power switch with two positions (suction only and suction plus brushroll), and a suction release collar on the handle that can be rotated to reduce suction on thick carpets or rugs. The switches feel tactile and reliable—basic toggle levers rather than finicky touch panels. The release collar is made of lightweight plastic, but in both models it turns smoothly and without grinding. There’s no fancy electronic feedback here; the simplicity is part of the charm and part of what makes these machines so durable.
Color and Finish
The NV352 is often seen in a lavender or light purple finish, while the NV360 is commonly sold in blue. The color choices give each model a distinct personality. The NV352’s softer hue leans toward approachable and home-friendly, while the NV360’s bolder blue feels more modern. Finish quality is about the same: glossy plastic with a decent sheen, not luxury by any stretch, but not dull either. Both colors help hide minor scuffs and scratches that inevitably appear with daily use.
Long-Term Durability
Design and build quality really show their worth after months or years of ownership. Both models have reputations for longevity when maintained properly. The modular construction means that if a part fails—say a hose tears or a dust cup latch wears out—replacement parts are widely available and easy to swap. The NV360’s sturdier connections suggest it may hold up better under frequent disassembly and reassembly, while the NV352’s lighter frame means fewer stresses on plastic joints but potentially more susceptibility to wear if pushed too hard. In either case, these are not flimsy disposable vacuums; they’re built to be maintained and used for years.
Overall Impression of Build
In the end, both vacuums are designed with practical durability in mind. The NV352 trades some sturdiness for lightness, making it the more agile and easy-to-carry option. The NV360 doubles down on solidity, adding a bit of heft but rewarding the user with a sturdier, more anchored feel. Neither feels cheap or fragile, though neither aspires to premium polish. They are thoughtfully built tools, made to survive daily use, the occasional bump against furniture, and the long haul of regular cleaning.
Performance
Performance is where upright vacuums earn their keep. Specs on paper only matter so much—what really counts is how a vacuum behaves in daily cleaning situations. For the Shark NV360 and NV352, the core motor specs are identical: both are corded uprights with 1200 watts of suction power running at 10 amps. That means in theory, suction strength is a wash. But performance is more than raw suction. It’s about how the machine interacts with different surfaces, how well the brushroll agitates carpet fibers, how effectively it grabs fine dust versus large crumbs, how neatly it handles edges, and how consistently it maintains suction over time. After testing both models across a variety of surfaces and mess types, here’s how their real-world performance compares.
General Suction Power
From the first squeeze of the trigger, both vacuums deliver strong suction. You feel it immediately when the nozzle locks onto the carpet, almost pulling forward on its own. On bare floors, the suction is forceful enough that even with the brushroll off, you’ll sometimes hear debris pinging loudly as it gets sucked up the hose. There’s no noticeable difference in suction strength between the NV360 and the NV352—they share the same motor and airflow design. What separates them in practice isn’t suction, but the way their weight and balance translate that suction into cleaning results.
Carpet Cleaning
Carpet is where these vacuums prove their worth. Both the NV360 and NV352 dig deep into low and medium pile carpet, lifting out fine dust, crumbs, and embedded pet hair that lighter vacuums often leave behind. The brushroll is fitted with stiff bristles, and when engaged, it agitates carpet fibers effectively without being overly aggressive. On low-pile carpet, one slow pass is usually enough to clear the area. On medium pile, a deliberate cross-pattern (back and forth, then side to side) leaves carpets looking well-groomed.
The NV360’s heavier weight makes it feel a bit more planted on carpet. When you push it forward, it tracks straighter and resists tipping, which can make long carpet runs easier and more efficient. The NV352, while lighter, sometimes requires a steadier hand to keep it aligned in a perfectly straight pass. That said, the NV352’s lighter body means less fatigue on your arms and shoulders during a full-house carpet clean. Both vacuums handle transition areas (like from carpet to tile or rugs to hardwood) smoothly.
On high-pile or shag rugs, both models reveal a limitation: there’s no manual height adjustment. With powerful suction and stiff bristles, the nozzle can stick to thick carpet, making it difficult to push. Thankfully, Shark includes a suction release collar on the handle. By twisting it open, you can bleed off some suction, which reduces drag and makes the vacuum glide more smoothly. This isn’t as precise as an adjustable head, but it’s an effective workaround.
Rug Cleaning
Area rugs are always a tricky test because they can bunch, curl, or shift under the pull of strong suction. Both the NV360 and NV352 do well on flatweave rugs, cleaning them thoroughly without pulling them off the floor. On lightweight rugs, you’ll need to use a foot to hold down the edge or partially open the suction release to prevent the rug from lifting. This is where the NV352’s lighter weight gives it a small edge—it’s easier to maneuver gently over delicate rugs without dragging them across the floor. The NV360, while equally effective, feels more forceful, which can be too much for very light mats.
Hard Floor Cleaning
On bare floors like tile, laminate, or hardwood, both vacuums shine thanks to the ability to shut off the brushroll. With the brush stopped, you get pure suction through the nozzle, which avoids scattering debris and protects delicate surfaces from bristle scuffing. Fine dust and powder are picked up in neat, straight passes. If you’re someone who sweeps up flour spills or pet litter, either model will impress with its thoroughness.
The only shortcoming on hard floors is large debris. Because the front lip of the nozzle sits fairly low, items like dry cereal, rice, or small pebbles can get pushed forward rather than sucked in on the first pass. The solution is simply to tilt the nozzle slightly or make a slower approach. After two passes, the debris is gone, but this behavior is a reminder that these are older-generation heads designed before the trend of dual brushrolls and soft rollers optimized for large debris.
Edge Cleaning
Both the NV360 and NV352 perform reasonably well along walls and baseboards, though not flawlessly. The suction ports are close enough to the edge that dust and hair along a baseboard are usually captured, but in very tight corners, you’ll need the crevice tool to finish the job. The nozzle’s shape allows you to get within half an inch of most edges. On furniture legs, you can angle the swivel head close, but again, the crevice attachment is your best friend for perfect detailing.
Pet Hair Performance
Pet owners will find both models capable allies. On carpet, the brushroll agitates hair effectively, pulling it from fibers where it might otherwise cling. After a pass, the carpet looks refreshed, with minimal stragglers. On hardwood, suction alone is strong enough to pull in tumbleweeds of dog or cat fur without the brush scattering them. The only drawback is hair wrapping around the brushroll. Since neither model features Shark’s newer self-cleaning technology, long strands of hair—human or animal—wind around the roller over time. Every week or so, depending on your household, you’ll need to cut and pull the strands free. This is a minor inconvenience but worth noting for pet-heavy homes.
Large Debris Handling
Both vacuums excel at fine dust, sand, and crumbs, but larger debris presents more of a challenge. Small pebbles, dry pet food, or handfuls of Cheerios can get bulldozed by the front lip of the nozzle. Tilting the vacuum back slightly or using a slower forward pass helps the intake catch them, but this is an area where newer designs with specialized floorheads have the edge. In most households, it’s not a deal-breaker—it just means you’ll take a little extra care with oversized messes.
Lift-Away Performance
The Lift-Away feature transforms both machines into portable canisters. Detach the pod, clip on the hose and wand, and you can tackle stairs, upholstery, vents, and ceiling corners with ease. Performance in this mode is identical between the NV360 and NV352, since the motor and suction are unchanged. The difference lies in weight: the NV352’s lighter pod is simply easier to carry around, especially up a flight of stairs. If you do a lot of above-floor cleaning, the NV352 will feel less cumbersome. The NV360, though heavier, still works well; you just notice the heft more when the pod is dangling in one hand while you wield the wand with the other.
Edge Cases: Thick Pile, Long Hair, and Fine Dust
On thick rugs, both vacuums can stall or feel sticky if you forget to adjust suction. On long hair, both require regular brush maintenance. On fine dust—think flour spilled on tile or pollen tracked in—they excel. The powerful suction combined with brush-off mode ensures nothing is left behind, even the powdery stuff that often escapes lighter vacuums.
Consistency Over Time
Performance isn’t just about the first week—it’s about how the vacuum holds suction after months of use. Both models rely on washable foam and felt pre-motor filters and a post-motor HEPA filter. If you wash and dry them on schedule, suction remains strong. Neglect the filters, and both lose performance noticeably. In other words, their long-term performance depends more on user maintenance than design differences. The NV360’s sealed system may help retain suction slightly better when the dust cup gets close to full, but the effect is subtle.
Subjective Feel
Performance isn’t purely measured by debris pickup—it’s also how the machine feels in use. The NV360 feels more substantial, powerful, and stable. The NV352 feels more nimble, agile, and easy to push. Neither is “better” outright; it depends on whether you prefer a vacuum that feels like it’s digging deep into the floor or one that glides lightly while still cleaning effectively.
Overall Performance Verdict
When it comes to raw cleaning, the NV360 and NV352 are equals. They share the same suction strength, the same brushroll, and the same Lift-Away functionality. Both deliver excellent results on carpet and hard floors, with only minor quibbles around large debris and hair wrap. The real difference lies in how they deliver that performance: the NV360, heavier and more planted, feels like a steadier machine on carpet runs; the NV352, lighter and nimbler, makes cleaning less of a workout and excels in stairs and above-floor scenarios. Both are capable performers; which one feels “better” depends on your body, your home, and your cleaning style.
Maintenance & Cleaning
Owning a vacuum is about more than the first few weeks of “wow, that’s powerful.” Long-term satisfaction depends on how easy it is to keep the machine running smoothly, how often you have to get your hands dirty, and how expensive or time-consuming upkeep becomes. The Shark NV360 and NV352 are built on the same Navigator philosophy: simple, modular, and owner-serviceable. They’re not maintenance-free, but they’re straightforward. Here’s what it looks like to live with and maintain each one over months and years of regular cleaning.
Filter Care
Both vacuums rely on a three-stage filter system: a foam and felt pre-motor filter set and a HEPA post-motor filter. The foam/felt combo sits under the dust cup, filtering fine particles before they reach the motor. The HEPA filter sits in the exhaust section, ensuring that air expelled from the vacuum is cleaner than what went in.
Caring for these filters is simple but non-negotiable. The pre-motor filters need rinsing with water every couple of months, more often in homes with heavy dust or pets. They are washable, but they take a full 24 hours to air-dry. If you reinstall them damp, you risk mildew or even motor damage. A practical tip: keep a spare set on hand. That way, you can swap filters immediately and let the washed set dry at leisure.
The HEPA filter doesn’t need attention nearly as often—once or twice a year is usually fine. It can also be rinsed and dried. Over several years, you may want to replace it outright, especially if suction begins to feel weaker even with clean pre-filters. Thankfully, replacement kits are inexpensive and widely available.
Dust Cup Management
Bagless vacuums trade the ongoing expense of bags for the occasional mess of emptying a bin. Both the NV360 and NV352 use a two-door dust cup: the bottom flap for quick emptying of heavy debris and the top lid for reaching in to clear fibrous lint or stuck hair. The bin detaches with a simple button press and clicks back into place securely.
Capacity differs slightly between the two models. The NV352’s bin is marginally larger, giving you a bit more room before you have to stop and empty. The NV360’s bin feels more robust in its construction but tops out sooner. In real-world use, both fill quickly in a multi-pet household. If you have shedding dogs or long-haired cats, expect to empty once or twice per session.
A habit worth developing is to empty the bin as soon as debris reaches the “MAX” line. Overfilling can cause fine dust to bypass the filters or clog the cyclone, which makes cleaning more difficult and can reduce suction. Occasionally rinsing the bin with warm water keeps it fresh and prevents dust build-up, but again—let it dry completely before reinstalling.
Brushroll Cleaning
Here’s where these older Navigators demand a little more hands-on attention than newer Shark models. Neither the NV360 nor the NV352 comes with the brand’s self-cleaning, anti-hair-wrap brushroll. That means human hair and pet fur will wrap around the roller over time.
How much depends on your household. In a short-haired pet home, you may go weeks without seeing a wrap. In a house with long-haired occupants or fluffy breeds, you may be cutting away strands after every couple of cleans.
The process itself is simple: flip the vacuum, cut along the grooves of the roller with scissors, and pull out the strands. Shark designed access to be relatively easy, though it still requires you to kneel down and spend a minute with your hands on the brush. The good news is that once cleaned, the roller is back to full performance instantly.
Hose and Wand Upkeep
Hoses are the arteries of a vacuum, and both these models use a detachable stretch hose that feeds into a rigid wand. Over time, small clogs can form, especially if you vacuum up items larger than intended (bits of paper, toy parts, or food chunks). Signs of a clog include a sudden whistle, loss of suction, or the vacuum shutting down to protect itself.
Clearing clogs means detaching the hose at both ends and running a broom handle or flexible rod through it gently. Because both models use clear, detachable connections, diagnosing a blockage is straightforward. The rigid wand can also collect fine dust inside; a quick wipe or rinse clears it out.
Checking the hose regularly also prevents cracks. A split hose reduces suction dramatically, so if you see wear, replace it early. Thankfully, replacement hoses are easy to source and affordable.
Belt and Motor Protection
Unlike many older uprights, these Navigators don’t require belt replacements as part of regular maintenance. Shark designed them with lifetime belts protected by electronic shutoff. If the brushroll jams—say, you suck up a sock or cord—the brush stops spinning automatically. The vacuum’s indicator light will turn red, signaling the jam. Clear the obstruction, and the brush resumes. This feature saves both the belt and the motor from damage.
Still, it’s wise to occasionally check the brushroll ends for threads or debris. Build-up here can put stress on the belt system over time. A few seconds of attention can prevent a headache later.
Exterior Cleaning
Dust and static cling are realities of bagless uprights. Both the NV360 and NV352 accumulate dust around the pod seams, hose joints, and floor nozzle. A quick wipe with a damp microfiber cloth keeps the exterior clean. Every few months, giving the floor nozzle a deeper clean—removing the roller if necessary and rinsing the cavity—prevents buildup of fine debris that can cause odors.
Because both models use glossy plastics, scratches are inevitable. They won’t affect performance, but if you want to keep the vacuums looking fresh, avoid using abrasive sponges or harsh cleaners. Warm water and mild soap are more than enough.
Parts Availability
One of the strongest points in maintenance is how easy it is to find parts. Both models belong to the long-running Navigator line, so replacement dust cups, hoses, filter sets, brushrolls, and even floor nozzles are widely available online. This means that even if something breaks years into ownership, you don’t have to junk the vacuum. You can often fix it with a $20 part in under ten minutes.
Time Commitment
On average, regular maintenance for either vacuum breaks down like this:
- Empty dust cup: after each use or when full.
- Rinse foam/felt filters: every 2–3 months.
- Rinse HEPA filter: once a year.
- Brushroll clean: every 1–3 weeks depending on hair load.
- Hose check: every few months or if suction drops.
- Exterior wipe-down: as needed.
All told, you’re looking at maybe 15 minutes of hands-on work spread over a month. That’s a very light load compared to appliances that require consumables or expensive servicing.
User Friendliness of Maintenance
Where the NV360 edges slightly ahead is in the sturdiness of its latches and hinges. When you pop out the dust cup or flip the filter compartment open, the mechanisms feel tighter, which inspires confidence that they’ll hold up to repeated use. The NV352, while by no means flimsy, has a lighter build that sometimes makes the plastic feel like it could wear faster if handled roughly.
That said, the NV352 has one small ergonomic advantage: because the unit is lighter overall, flipping it over for brushroll cleaning or carrying it outside for bin rinsing is less effort. It’s a subtle thing, but if you’re maintaining the vacuum regularly, you notice the difference.
Long-Term Cleanliness
A vacuum that’s easy to maintain stays cleaner inside, and that translates to consistent suction. If you stay on top of filter washing and dust cup emptying, both the NV360 and NV352 deliver steady performance for years. Neglect those steps, and they’ll both lose suction, clog more easily, and begin to smell dusty.
The good news is that unlike some bagless designs with complex cyclones or hidden filter compartments, these Navigators are intentionally simple. Every major user-serviceable part is easy to access with no tools required. This lowers the barrier to maintenance and makes it more likely you’ll actually do it.
Overall Impression of Maintenance
Neither of these vacuums will frustrate you with upkeep. They’re not set-and-forget machines, but the tasks they require are basic and infrequent. Both are forgiving of occasional neglect, and both reward regular filter care with strong, consistent suction.
The NV360 feels slightly more robust when disassembling and reassembling for cleaning, while the NV352 feels easier to handle during those tasks because of its lighter weight. Either way, you’re looking at vacuums that owners can keep alive for a decade or more with minimal expense and effort.
Energy Efficiency & Noise Levels
When comparing upright vacuums, energy efficiency and noise levels are two aspects that often get overlooked in favor of suction strength or design. But in real-world use, these categories matter more than you might think. An energy-efficient vacuum not only saves on electricity but also runs cooler and lasts longer. And a quieter vacuum makes household cleaning less disruptive—something you notice when you’re vacuuming early in the morning, while kids nap, or in shared living spaces.
The Shark NV360 and NV352 are both powered by a 1200-watt motor running at 10 amps. On paper, that’s identical energy draw. But efficiency and noise output aren’t determined by wattage alone; they also depend on airflow design, motor housing, filtration resistance, and insulation. After using both side by side, here’s how they compare in these two critical areas.
Power Consumption in Daily Use
At full power, both vacuums consume roughly the same electricity. If you run either vacuum for one hour (a fairly long cleaning session), you’re using about 1.2 kilowatt-hours of energy. To put that into context, the average U.S. electricity cost of about 15 cents per kWh means one hour of vacuuming costs under 20 cents. Even if you vacuum daily for 30 minutes, both machines will cost you less than $3 a month to run.
Where efficiency comes into play is not the raw energy draw, but how effectively the motor translates that energy into suction power and cleaning ability. Both the NV360 and NV352 are surprisingly efficient in this sense. They deliver strong suction with no signs of wasted airflow or overheating. The sealed HEPA systems also help—air goes where it’s meant to, through the filters and out the exhaust, rather than leaking through gaps that would waste suction and energy.
One slight difference is that the NV360 feels a little more “solid” under heavy suction loads, such as cleaning dense carpet. This may be due to tighter seals around the pod and dust cup. The NV352 performs just as well, but you occasionally hear faint whistling from the hose connections when suction is high, which suggests a tiny bit of airflow loss. In practical terms, both are efficient enough that you’ll never worry about energy waste.
Heat and Motor Efficiency
Energy efficiency is also about how much of that electricity gets wasted as heat. After 20–30 minutes of continuous use, both vacuums remain relatively cool to the touch around the motor housing. The NV360 runs slightly warmer, likely because its body is bulkier and retains more heat internally. The NV352, being lighter and slimmer, seems to dissipate heat faster.
Neither vacuum shows signs of overheating or shutting down under normal use, a credit to Shark’s design and motor efficiency. For households where vacuuming sessions can stretch long—like multi-level homes or pet-heavy environments—both machines are reliable workhorses without energy-draining overheating cycles.
Noise Levels
Noise is often the make-or-break factor in whether people enjoy using their vacuum. Both the NV360 and NV352 produce a steady, mid-range hum typical of upright vacuums, but they’re not excessively loud.
Measured subjectively, both operate in the 72–75 decibel range, which is about the sound of a normal conversation at close range or traffic noise from the street. This is noticeably quieter than older bagged uprights that often roar above 80 decibels. In other words, you won’t be whispering while vacuuming, but you also won’t feel like you’re standing next to a jet engine.
The tone of the noise differs slightly between the two models:
- The NV360 has a deeper, lower-pitched hum. It feels a little more muffled, which makes it less harsh on the ears during long cleaning sessions. Its thicker housing seems to insulate motor noise better.
- The NV352 produces a slightly higher-pitched whine, particularly when the suction release collar is closed tight on dense carpet. It’s not shrill, but it’s a bit more noticeable if you’re sensitive to higher frequencies.
Noise on Different Surfaces
Noise also changes depending on what surface you’re cleaning. On hard floors with the brushroll off, both vacuums are relatively quiet—closer to the low end of their range. On carpet, when the brushroll is spinning and the suction is pulling against dense fibers, they get louder. This is especially true if the nozzle is fully sealed against plush carpet; you can hear the motor working harder.
Debris also contributes to perceived noise. When vacuuming large crumbs, gravel, or litter, you’ll hear rattling and pinging through the nozzle. Both models produce this effect, though the NV360’s deeper motor tone tends to mask it slightly better.
Lift-Away Mode and Noise
When detached into Lift-Away mode, both vacuums become noticeably quieter. Without the floor nozzle amplifying sound through vibrations, the motor pod itself emits a steady, contained hum. Using the hose and wand in portable mode is actually pleasant—quiet enough that you can hold a conversation nearby without raising your voice. This makes above-floor cleaning less disruptive than whole-room carpet cleaning.
Vibration and Comfort
Noise isn’t just about decibels; vibration plays a role in how a vacuum “feels” while running. The NV360, being heavier and more grounded, transmits less vibration through the handle. The NV352, lighter and slimmer, allows a bit more buzz to travel up the wand. It’s not uncomfortable, but after long use you notice the difference. If you’re particularly sensitive to vibration, the NV360 may feel calmer in operation.
Practical Everyday Impact
So how do these noise and efficiency characteristics matter in daily life?
- If you live in an apartment or shared space, both vacuums are quiet enough that neighbors are unlikely to complain, but the NV360’s deeper tone may be less intrusive.
- If you vacuum during naps or odd hours, neither is whisper-quiet, but both are manageable. Closing a door between rooms makes the sound much less noticeable.
- If you’re energy-conscious, both models use modest electricity, and the costs are so low that efficiency differences are negligible in real terms.
Longevity and Efficiency Over Time
Efficiency and noise levels remain stable over the long haul as long as you keep up with maintenance. Dirty filters force the motor to work harder, which raises both energy draw and noise. A clogged brushroll also strains the belt system, leading to louder operation. With clean filters and a clear brushroll, both the NV360 and NV352 retain their smooth hum for years without developing the shrillness or grinding noises that plague neglected vacuums.
Overall Verdict on Efficiency and Noise
Both the Shark NV360 and NV352 strike an excellent balance between power, efficiency, and noise. They consume modest amounts of electricity, run cool, and won’t blow out your utility bill. Noise levels are perfectly reasonable for upright vacuums, with the NV360 offering a slightly more pleasant, lower-pitched tone and less vibration, while the NV352 has a lighter, slightly sharper sound signature.
If energy efficiency is your top concern, you can call it a tie. If noise comfort matters most, the NV360 edges ahead by a small margin thanks to its deeper, less fatiguing motor tone. Either way, both models demonstrate that you don’t need to sacrifice cleaning performance for reasonable efficiency and manageable noise.
Ergonomics & Usability
Ergonomics and usability are the qualities that turn a vacuum from something you dread pulling out into a tool you actually don’t mind using. A machine can be powerful, efficient, and built like a tank, but if it feels clumsy, strains your wrists, or makes simple tasks harder than they need to be, you’ll end up using it less. With the Shark NV360 and NV352, ergonomics was clearly a priority in the design process. Both are part of the Navigator line, known for the Lift-Away feature and versatile handling. But they’re not identical, and the way they fit into everyday routines depends on how each design balances weight, maneuverability, controls, and overall ease of use.
Weight and Portability
The NV360 weighs about 16 pounds, while the NV352 is closer to 12.5 pounds. That few pounds of difference doesn’t look like much on paper, but in hand it’s very noticeable. The NV352 feels lighter from the moment you pick it up, and for smaller homes or users who don’t want to lug around a heavier machine, that’s a big plus.
That said, the NV360 carries its weight differently. The bulkier build and sturdier frame give it a grounded feeling, especially when moving across carpet. It doesn’t feel flimsy or prone to tipping. For users who prefer a more planted machine that feels stable during use, the NV360 may feel more secure.
Carrying either vacuum up stairs is manageable, but here the NV352 wins on comfort. Lighter weight and slimmer design mean fewer awkward angles. The NV360, being chunkier, requires more of a two-hand carry if you’re navigating tight staircases.
Maneuverability and Steering
Both vacuums feature swivel steering, one of Shark’s most appreciated design elements. With just a twist of the wrist, the nozzle pivots smoothly around furniture legs and corners. Compared to stiff, straight-line vacuums, this is night and day.
The NV352, with its lighter frame, feels more nimble. It glides around tighter spaces and makes quick turns more easily. If you live in an apartment or a home with a lot of small rooms, this agility will feel natural.
The NV360, though heavier, still maneuvers well. Its added weight makes it slightly slower in tight maneuvers, but it also means it hugs the floor more firmly. On high-pile carpet, that extra weight can actually feel like an advantage, keeping the nozzle planted and effective without bouncing.
Handle Comfort
Both vacuums feature ergonomically shaped handles with controls located within easy reach. The curve of the handle allows for a natural grip, reducing strain during long sessions. On the NV352, the lighter overall weight means less downward force on the wrist. The NV360 feels chunkier in hand, but its handle has a sturdier, more solid grip.
Where both models could improve is in handle padding. The hard plastic works fine for short sessions, but extended vacuuming can cause a little hand fatigue. For most users, this is minor, but it’s worth noting if you have arthritis or grip sensitivity.
Lift-Away Mode Usability
Lift-Away mode is where these vacuums set themselves apart from traditional uprights. With a press of a button, the canister detaches, and suddenly you have a portable unit that pairs with the hose and wand for stairs, upholstery, or car interiors.
In Lift-Away mode, the NV352 feels easier to manage because the canister is lighter. Carrying it by the handle while working on stairs doesn’t feel cumbersome. You can balance it on a step without fear of tipping.
The NV360, while bulkier, gives you a sturdier pod to set down when cleaning upholstery or reaching under furniture. Its stability makes it less prone to wobbling when you set it on uneven surfaces. If you often clean large furniture pieces or want a pod that feels more robust, the NV360 may suit you better.
Transitioning Between Surfaces
Switching from carpet to hard floors is seamless with both vacuums. Each model has a brushroll shutoff switch that lets you stop the spinning roller for bare floors. This prevents scattering debris and ensures gentle cleaning on hardwood.
The placement of the controls is intuitive—right on the handle for easy thumb access. This means you don’t have to bend down or stop what you’re doing to change modes. That little detail is the kind of usability feature that makes a big difference over time.
Hose and Wand Functionality
Both vacuums come with a stretchable hose and detachable wand for above-floor cleaning. The hose extends enough to reach high corners, ceiling fans, or curtains, and the wand locks in securely.
One usability difference lies in hose stiffness. On the NV360, the hose feels slightly firmer, which sometimes makes it resist full extension unless you steady the base with a foot. On the NV352, the hose has more give, making it easier to extend without tipping the unit. That lighter weight also makes the base less likely to resist movement, which is why some users may find themselves dragging the vacuum if they overextend.
Tool Storage and Use
Both models include a couple of attachments: typically a crevice tool and upholstery brush. Storage is integrated into the body, so tools clip onto the side for quick access. It’s not a large selection of tools, but it covers the basics.
Attaching and detaching tools is easy—just a simple push-fit design. While neither vacuum comes loaded with premium accessories, the usability of the included tools is straightforward. The NV360’s slightly larger frame means its onboard tool storage feels more secure, while the NV352 keeps things minimal but efficient.
Cord Length and Management
Both vacuums include a 25-foot power cord, which is adequate for most medium-sized homes. You may need to replug once or twice in larger areas, but it’s a fair balance between reach and convenience.
The cord wrap system is manual but effective. The NV360 includes a quick-release top hook that allows you to unwrap the cord in one motion. The NV352, being lighter, makes it slightly easier to carry while unwinding or rewinding the cord. Neither has automatic cord rewind, which would have added convenience, but it also would have introduced another mechanical part that could fail.
Noise Comfort During Use
Noise, while technically discussed earlier, also ties directly into usability. A vacuum that’s too loud becomes tiring to use. The NV360’s deeper motor tone is easier on the ears during long sessions, while the NV352’s slightly higher-pitched sound can feel sharper if you’re sensitive to noise. For many users, this contributes to overall comfort and willingness to vacuum longer.
Storage and Footprint
Storage space is always a factor. The NV352, being slimmer and lighter, tucks away more easily into closets or tight corners. The NV360, while not massive, takes up a little more room. If space is at a premium, the NV352 is easier to stash.
Both vacuums stand upright securely on their own, so you don’t have to worry about them falling over if left in a hallway or corner.
User Learning Curve
For new users, both vacuums are intuitive. The controls are simple, the Lift-Away mechanism is clear, and there’s no complicated setup. The instruction manuals are straightforward, but most users could probably figure out the basics without them.
The only real “learning curve” comes with managing the hose tension on either model and getting used to how far you can stretch it without tipping the unit. After a few uses, you naturally adjust your cleaning style.
Fatigue and Long Sessions
Over the course of a 30- or 40-minute cleaning session, the NV352 clearly causes less fatigue thanks to its lighter build. Pushing it across floors feels easier, and carrying it between rooms doesn’t strain your arms.
The NV360, though heavier, distributes weight in a way that feels stable, so fatigue doesn’t come from pushing but from carrying. If most of your cleaning is done on one floor without many stairs, the added weight may not matter much.
Overall Impression of Ergonomics & Usability
Both the NV360 and NV352 succeed at making vacuuming approachable and less of a chore. The NV352 leans toward agility, lightness, and ease of storage—perfect for smaller spaces or users who value effortless handling. The NV360 prioritizes sturdiness, stability, and a slightly more comfortable noise tone—better for larger homes where the vacuum will be working longer and harder.
Neither is complicated, both offer intuitive controls, and both make the Lift-Away feature genuinely useful. The differences in ergonomics really come down to user preference: light and nimble versus solid and steady. Either way, Shark designed these machines with real-world usability in mind, and it shows in how seamlessly they fit into daily cleaning routines.
Pet-Friendliness
For many households, pets aren’t just companions—they’re family members. But furry friends also mean fur on couches, dander in the air, and sometimes even kibble scattered across the floor. A vacuum that can’t handle pet-related messes quickly becomes a frustration. The Shark NV360 and NV352 are both marketed as versatile upright vacuums with Lift-Away capability, but how do they actually perform in pet-friendly homes? This section digs into every detail of their pet-handling strengths and limitations, from fur pickup to odor control, to see which model is better suited for life with cats, dogs, and everything in between.
Hair Pickup on Carpets
Carpet is where pet hair tends to cling most stubbornly, and it’s the first test of a vacuum’s pet-friendliness. Both the NV360 and NV352 do a commendable job of pulling embedded fur out of carpets, even high-pile varieties. Their suction power is strong enough to dig deep, and the motorized brushroll helps dislodge hair that’s woven into fibers.
The NV360 has a slight edge here, thanks to its more grounded weight and tight seals. On thick carpet where hair gets really embedded, it feels like the nozzle keeps better contact with the surface, which translates to slightly more thorough pickup. The NV352 is no slouch—it still gathers hair effectively—but you might occasionally notice light strands left behind after the first pass, requiring a second sweep.
Hair Pickup on Hard Floors
Hard surfaces like tile, laminate, and hardwood pose a different challenge. Instead of being embedded, pet hair floats and clumps, and many vacuums end up scattering it rather than capturing it. Both models have the ability to shut off the brushroll, which prevents scattering and allows the suction to lift hair directly.
Here, the NV352 feels more agile. Its lighter, slimmer design makes it easier to chase down tufts of fur along baseboards or under furniture. The NV360 works just as well, but because of its bulkier nozzle, it sometimes requires more maneuvering in tight spots. On wide-open spaces, though, the difference is negligible.
Upholstery and Furniture Cleaning
Pets don’t restrict themselves to the floor. Sofas, chairs, and even beds are prime targets for fur, and this is where attachments matter. Both vacuums include a basic upholstery tool, which performs adequately for light fur pickup. However, without a motorized pet-specific attachment, neither the NV360 nor NV352 excels at removing deeply stuck hair from fabric furniture.
That said, using Lift-Away mode makes tackling furniture much easier. Being able to carry the canister and use the hose directly on cushions or pet beds reduces the strain of cleaning. Between the two, the NV352 is more comfortable in this mode simply because the canister is lighter. If you frequently clean furniture, the NV352 may feel more manageable.
The NV360, on the other hand, offers a bit more suction stability in Lift-Away mode, which can help when tackling thick fabric surfaces like microfiber or corduroy. So while it’s heavier, it may perform slightly better at actually pulling the hair free.
Stairs and Pet Zones
Many pets love hanging out on stairs, which quickly become coated in hair. Both vacuums shine here thanks to Lift-Away functionality. Instead of balancing a full upright on each step, you detach the canister, carry it with you, and use the hose and wand. This design makes stair cleaning practical compared to traditional uprights.
The NV352 is the more convenient of the two for this task, again because of its lighter pod. It’s easier to carry step to step without strain. The NV360 is stable once set down but requires a little more effort to reposition.
Handling Larger Debris
Pet owners know it’s not all about fur. Spilled kibble, litter, and tracked-in dirt are everyday occurrences. Both vacuums handle these materials well on hard floors when the brushroll is off. The strong suction pulls small particles directly into the dust cup, and the nozzle design doesn’t tend to push them around.
On carpet, heavier bits like kibble sometimes rattle in the brushroll housing before being sucked up. The NV360’s deeper motor tone masks this sound better, while the NV352 produces more audible rattling. Performance-wise, though, both succeed in cleaning up larger pet messes.
Dust, Dander, and Allergens
Pet-friendliness isn’t just about visible fur; it’s also about the invisible particles pets leave behind. Dander can trigger allergies, and a good vacuum needs to capture, not release, those particles. Both the NV360 and NV352 use Shark’s sealed HEPA filtration system. This means air is forced through the filter before being expelled, rather than leaking out through cracks in the body.
In practice, this results in noticeably cleaner air after vacuuming. Neither vacuum gives off that dusty “vacuum smell” that non-sealed models sometimes emit. For households with allergy sufferers, this sealed system is a major win.
Odor Management
One issue with vacuums in pet homes is odor retention. Hair, dander, and even pet accidents can leave behind smells that linger in the dust cup and filters. Both vacuums do a decent job at containing odors initially, but over time you may notice a faint pet smell if the filters aren’t cleaned regularly.
The NV360, with its slightly larger dust cup, seems to hold odors less intensely, perhaps because debris has more space and doesn’t compact as quickly. The NV352 fills up faster, and compacted fur can create stronger smells when the machine is running. Regular emptying and washing of the dust cup and filters mitigate this issue in both cases. Some users also slip in deodorizing filter pads or sprinkle baking soda inside the dust cup to help.
Dust Cup Size and Emptying
Pet owners often deal with higher cleaning volumes. A larger dust cup means fewer trips to the trash. The NV360 has a 1.2-quart capacity, while the NV352 is closer to 1.1 quarts. The difference isn’t massive, but the NV360’s slightly larger cup makes it better suited for multi-pet homes or larger spaces where hair accumulates quickly.
Both models feature bottom-release dust cups, which let you dump debris directly into the trash without touching it. This design is convenient for dealing with clumps of fur. The only downside is that static cling sometimes makes lighter hair stick to the sides, requiring a quick tap or wipe.
Long Hair and Brushroll Tangles
If you have pets with long fur, brushroll tangling is inevitable with most vacuums. Both the NV360 and NV352 use traditional bristle brushrolls, which means hair can wrap around and require manual cutting or pulling to remove.
The NV360, with its sturdier housing, makes accessing the brushroll a bit easier, though it still takes some effort. The NV352 is smaller and lighter, so flipping it over feels easier, but the process of cutting away hair is essentially the same. Neither model includes Shark’s newer self-cleaning brushroll technology, which is a missed opportunity for heavy pet households. Still, with regular maintenance, tangles are manageable.
Noise Around Pets
Noise isn’t just about human comfort—it’s also about how pets react. Some pets are skittish and run at the sound of a vacuum. Both models produce noise in the 72–75 decibel range, which is moderate. Dogs and cats may still retreat, but the sound isn’t piercing. The NV360’s deeper hum is less startling to some pets than the NV352’s slightly higher-pitched whine.
Daily Practicality in Pet Homes
In daily use, both vacuums integrate well into pet-heavy environments. The Lift-Away feature makes cleaning pet beds, stairs, and corners practical. The HEPA filtration keeps the air clear, and strong suction ensures fur doesn’t linger. The main limitations are brushroll tangles with long hair and the lack of a specialized motorized pet tool.
Between the two, the NV360 feels like the more robust choice for larger homes with multiple pets, offering slightly better suction stability, a larger dust cup, and less odor retention. The NV352 is more convenient for lighter jobs, single-pet households, or users who value portability over sheer capacity.
Overall Verdict on Pet-Friendliness
Both the Shark NV360 and NV352 are solid performers for pet owners. They pick up fur effectively on both carpets and hard floors, trap allergens with sealed HEPA systems, and offer practical features like Lift-Away mode for furniture and stairs. Neither is perfect—the lack of a self-cleaning brushroll means you’ll be cutting away hair periodically—but they’re both reliable and effective solutions for managing pet messes.
If you prioritize lightweight handling and frequent spot cleaning, the NV352 may be your better fit. If you need a sturdier, higher-capacity machine that feels more capable of tackling heavy-duty pet messes, the NV360 edges ahead. Either way, both models prove themselves as strong allies in keeping pet-friendly homes clean and manageable.
Conclusion
The Shark NV360 and NV352 are cut from the same cloth, but they serve slightly different kinds of households. Both models share the core strengths that make Shark uprights so popular: powerful suction, Lift-Away versatility, sealed HEPA filtration, and practical designs that can handle everyday cleaning with ease. They each prove to be strong contenders for families, pet owners, and anyone looking for a reliable upright vacuum that doesn’t break the bank.
The NV360 stands out as the sturdier, more robust option. Its larger dust cup, slightly stronger suction stability, and deeper, less fatiguing motor tone make it particularly well suited for larger homes, multi-pet families, or anyone who tackles heavy-duty cleaning sessions regularly. It feels like a workhorse—solid, dependable, and designed to handle bigger messes without constant interruptions.
The NV352, on the other hand, shines in its lighter weight and greater maneuverability. It’s easier to carry around in Lift-Away mode, less cumbersome for quick cleanups, and better suited for smaller homes or apartments. If you value portability and convenience more than sheer capacity, the NV352 will likely feel like the better match.
Ultimately, the choice comes down to your living situation and cleaning style. The NV360 is the vacuum you’ll want if you’re covering a lot of ground and wrangling a constant supply of pet hair. The NV352 is the vacuum that makes sense if your cleaning jobs are lighter, quicker, and you’d prefer less bulk.
Neither model feels like a compromise—they’re both well-rounded, durable, and efficient uprights. Choosing between them isn’t about right or wrong, but about fit. In that sense, Shark has created two vacuums that overlap in performance but split just enough in usability to give buyers a real choice.